corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 5667

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: Journal Article

American Society of Clinical Oncology.
Reimbursement for cancer treatment: coverage of off-label drug indications.
J Clin Oncol 2006 Jul 1; 24:(19):3206-8
http://www.jco.org/cgi/content/full/24/19/3206


Abstract:

Approximately half of the uses of anticancer chemotherapy drugs are for indications other than those referenced in the United States Food and Drug Administration approved label. Some managed care organizations and private health insurance plans have declined to reimburse the cost of drugs used off-label to treat cancer on the ground that these uses are “experimental” or “investigational.” Cancer patients and their providers have experienced similar problems in the Medicare and Medicaid program. To a large extent, these issues have been addressed through legislation enacted in 1993 that requires coverage of medically appropriate cancer therapies including off-label uses recognized by established drug compendia and peer-reviewed literature. Congress has fashioned a system that has worked well, as reflected in improvements in cancer morbidity and mortality. Now, however, after more than a decade of success, the system requires attention. This statement of policy from the American Society of Clinical Oncology encourages the Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services to address these unmet needs in order to ensure that patients with cancer have access to clinically appropriate treatment, as reflected in timely compendia listings and reports of studies in the medical literature.

Keywords:
Aged Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use* Drug Labeling* Humans Insurance Coverage* Insurance, Health, Reimbursement* Legislation, Drug Managed Care Programs Medicaid/legislation & jurisprudence Medicare/legislation & jurisprudence Neoplasms/drug therapy* United States United States Food and Drug Administration

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








...to influence multinational corporations effectively, the efforts of governments will have to be complemented by others, notably the many voluntary organisations that have shown they can effectively represent society’s public-health interests…
A small group known as Healthy Skepticism; formerly the Medical Lobby for Appropriate Marketing) has consistently and insistently drawn the attention of producers to promotional malpractice, calling for (and often securing) correction. These organisations [Healthy Skepticism, Médecins Sans Frontières and Health Action International] are small, but they are capable; they bear malice towards no one, and they are inscrutably honest. If industry is indeed persuaded to face up to its social responsibilities in the coming years it may well be because of these associations and others like them.
- Dukes MN. Accountability of the pharmaceutical industry. Lancet. 2002 Nov 23; 360(9346)1682-4.