corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 5530

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: news

Weber J, Carey J.
Drug ads: A prescription for controversy
Business Week 1993 Jan 1858-59


Abstract:

Direct-to-consumer advertising of prescription drugs is becoming more common but both advocates and critics of the issue are upset with the Food and Drug Administration’s criteria for the ads. Both groups don’t like the requirement for a “brief summary” of the drug’s risks, benefits and uses. Critics say that it could let a drugmaker bury vital information about it’s product’s dangers in information no one reads; drug companies say that it hampers their efforts to reach consumers by adding to marketing costs. Plans by the FDA to issue new guidelines are on hold and there is no consensus on how to improve the regulation of DTCA.

Keywords:
*news story/United States/DTCA/direct-to-consumer advertising/Food and Drug Administration/FDA/regulation of promotion/ fair balance(brief summary)/ATTITUDES REGARDING PROMOTION: CONSUMERS/PATIENTS/ATTITUDES REGARDING PROMOTION: INDUSTRY/EVALUATION OF PROMOTION: DIRECT-TO-CONSUMER ADVERTISING/REGULATION, CODES, GUIDELINES: DIRECT GOVERNMENT REGULATION

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








Cases of wilful misrepresentation are a rarity in medical advertising. For every advertisement in which nonexistent doctors are called on to testify or deliberately irrelevant references are bunched up in [fine print], you will find a hundred or more whose greatest offenses are unquestioning enthusiasm and the skill to communicate it.

The best defence the physician can muster against this kind of advertising is a healthy skepticism and a willingness, not always apparent in the past, to do his homework. He must cultivate a flair for spotting the logical loophole, the invalid clinical trial, the unreliable or meaningless testimonial, the unneeded improvement and the unlikely claim. Above all, he must develop greater resistance to the lure of the fashionable and the new.
- Pierre R. Garai (advertising executive) 1963