corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 5446

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: Journal Article

Wilson N, Signal L, Nicholls S, Thomson G.
Marketing fat and sugar to children on New Zealand television.
Prev Med 2006 Feb 01; 42:(2):96-101
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&_udi=B6WPG-4HR728W-3&_coverDate=02%2F28%2F2006&_alid=421626197&_rdoc=1&_fmt=&_orig=search&_qd=1&_cdi=6990&_sort=d&view=c&_acct=C000050221&_version=1&_urlVersion=0&_userid=10&md5=714528a780249b523be8cf34df8dcd63


Abstract:

BACKGROUND: We aimed to determine the frequency and content of television food advertisements during children’s viewing times on various New Zealand television channels. METHODS: A content analysis was conducted of two free-to-air channels covering a total of 155 h of television time during children’s viewing times (n = 858 food advertisements in 2005). Comparisons were made with data from 1997 and data from Australia. RESULTS: Compared to Australian channels, both New Zealand channels (TV3 and TV2) had significantly higher proportions of food advertisements that were classified as being “high in fat and/or sugar” (54% versus 80% and 69%, respectively). Using a more detailed classification system, 70.3% of food advertisements on the New Zealand channels were for foods “counter to improved nutrition” (95% CI: 67.1%, 73.3%) compared to those “favoring improved nutrition” at 5.1% (95% CI: 3.8%, 6.9%). The number of food advertisements per hour was higher in 2005 than in 1997 for the channel (TV2) for which there was time trend data (12.8 versus 8.0 per hour for the afternoon time slot). CONCLUSIONS: These findings provide further evidence that the majority of food advertising on New Zealand television is counter to nutritional guidelines. They suggest the need for further regulatory or other controls.

Keywords:
Advertising*/trends Australia Child Child Nutrition* Comparative Study Dietary Fats Dietary Sucrose Food Industry* Food Preferences* Humans New Zealand Nutritive Value Public Policy Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Television* Time Factors

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








...to influence multinational corporations effectively, the efforts of governments will have to be complemented by others, notably the many voluntary organisations that have shown they can effectively represent society’s public-health interests…
A small group known as Healthy Skepticism; formerly the Medical Lobby for Appropriate Marketing) has consistently and insistently drawn the attention of producers to promotional malpractice, calling for (and often securing) correction. These organisations [Healthy Skepticism, Médecins Sans Frontières and Health Action International] are small, but they are capable; they bear malice towards no one, and they are inscrutably honest. If industry is indeed persuaded to face up to its social responsibilities in the coming years it may well be because of these associations and others like them.
- Dukes MN. Accountability of the pharmaceutical industry. Lancet. 2002 Nov 23; 360(9346)1682-4.