corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 5127

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: Journal Article

Clement OO, Guner OF.
Possibilities for transfer of relevant data without revealing structural information.
J Comput Aided Mol Des 2005 Sep-Oct 01; 19:(9-10):731-8
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/utils/lofref.fcgi?PrId=3055&uid=16331404&db=PubMed&url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10822-005-9026-y


Abstract:

In this paper, we discuss how we safely exchanged proprietary data between third parties in the early years of predictive ADME/Tox model development. At that time, industry scientists wanted to evaluate predictive models, but were not willing to share their structures with software vendors. At the same time, model developers were willing to run the scientists’ structures through their models, but they were not willing to reveal which descriptors were important for a particular predictive model. We developed a process where scientists could perform calculations on a broad number of commercially available public descriptors and forward results as a property file, instead of their structures. Meanwhile, the model developer could extract descriptors used in the predictive model, run the model, and pass results back to the scientist. On the following pages, we discuss the pros and cons of this approach, and we address questions such as: Can structural information that is proprietary be compromised from descriptors in ADME/Tox models? Can ADME/Tox predictions be made purely from descriptors, without the explicit knowledge of chemical structures, proprietary or otherwise?

Keywords:
Chemistry, Pharmaceutical Computer Simulation* Drug Design Drug Industry Models, Chemical* Molecular Structure Software

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








Far too large a section of the treatment of disease is to-day controlled by the big manufacturing pharmacists, who have enslaved us in a plausible pseudo-science...
The blind faith which some men have in medicines illustrates too often the greatest of all human capacities - the capacity for self deception...
Some one will say, Is this all your science has to tell us? Is this the outcome of decades of good clinical work, of patient study of the disease, of anxious trial in such good faith of so many drugs? Give us back the childlike trust of the fathers in antimony and in the lancet rather than this cold nihilism. Not at all! Let us accept the truth, however unpleasant it may be, and with the death rate staring us in the face, let us not be deceived with vain fancies...
we need a stern, iconoclastic spirit which leads, not to nihilism, but to an active skepticism - not the passive skepticism, born of despair, but the active skepticism born of a knowledge that recognizes its limitations and knows full well that only in this attitude of mind can true progress be made.
- William Osler 1909