corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 5056

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: Journal Article

Moldrup C, Hansen RR.
Public acceptance of drug use for non-disease conditions.
Curr Med Res Opin 2006 Apr; 22:(4):775-80
http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/libra/cmro/2006/00000022/00000004/art00017?token=005b1d8c135bf15a7f11d7627502b333e3568263c2b6f7e2a46762c47355d36766c254423795f7b37683b6dbe1a


Abstract:

OBJECTIVE: This article deals with the issue of ordinary healthy people using drugs to improve or enhance non-disease conditions. The objective is to illuminate the extent of public acceptance of this practice. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: The results are based on two studies: a classically structured telephone interview with 961 Danes in 1999 and an Internet questionnaire survey of 2735 Danes in 2003. The two studies cannot be compared due to differences in recruitment and methodology. RESULTS: Based on basic descriptive statistics, the studies show substantial public acceptance of the use of drugs for non-disease conditions. Men in particular look favourably on the use of drugs by healthy individuals. People with less education find this type of drug use unacceptable to a greater extent than those with more education, who are more positive. If we look at political affiliation, a pattern emerges. People who did not vote or voted for one of the left-wing parties are less likely to accept this type of drug use. The extent to which people work with drugs professionally does not seem to influence the extent to which they are positive or negative about this type of drug use. CONCLUSION: The implications of this development encompass a wide range of concerns, from the individual risk of side effects to general issues concerning the prioritisation of health care resources. The results need more attention, including further studies, professional consideration and health policy decisions.

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend