corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 5019

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: Journal Article

Keim SM, Sanders AB, Witzke DB, Dyne P, Fulginiti JW.
Beliefs and practices of emergency medicine faculty and residents regarding professional interactions with the biomedical industry.
Ann Emerg Med 1993 Oct; 22:(10):1576-81
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&_udi=B6WB0-4G82KSP-G&_coverDate=10%2F31%2F1993&_alid=409874800&_rdoc=1&_fmt=&_orig=search&_qd=1&_cdi=6696&_sort=d&view=c&_acct=C000050221&_version=1&_urlVersion=0&_userid=10&md5=c9e69f46e454e334bb60e2c0aeaf1787


Abstract:

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To examine emergency medicine resident training and understanding of general bioethics and resident and faculty attitudes and behavior regarding professional interactions with the biomedical industry. DESIGN: Two companion questionnaire surveys. SETTING: Annual resident in-service examination and written director survey with telephone follow-up. PARTICIPANTS: Emergency medicine residents and program directors. INTERVENTIONS: chi 2 analysis was used for questions involving relationships among variables with dichotomous or categorical response. An analysis of variance or Pearson Product Moment Correlation was calculated for questions with continuous variables. MEASUREMENTS AND
MAIN RESULTS: The surveys were completed by 1,385 of 1,836 (75%) residents and 80 of 81 (99%) residency directors. On average, residents receive eight hours of bioethical instruction per year but believe that they need 12 hours per year. Seventy-five percent of residents believe that company representatives sometimes cross ethical boundaries. The amount of resident understanding of bioethical concepts correlated with the number of hours of bioethics training they received. A sensitivity to bioethical conflicts index was correlated with the residents’ behavior. CONCLUSION: There is wide variation in beliefs and practices regarding the interaction between emergency medicine residents and directors and the biomedical industry. Our results suggest that residents need training regarding conflicts of interest, accepted standards of practice, and dealing with potential conflicts with the biomedical industry.

Keywords:
*analytic survey/United States/gift giving/bioethics/relationship between physicians in training and industry/physicians in training/attitude toward industry/residency directors/ATTITUDES REGARDING PROMOTION: MEDICAL EDUCATORS/ATTITUDES REGARDING PROMOTION: PHYSICIANS IN TRAINING/EDUCATING ABOUT PROMOTION: PHYSICIANS IN TRAINING/ETHICAL ISSUES IN PROMOTION: GIFT GIVING/ETHICAL ISSUES IN PROMOTION: LINKS BETWEEN HEALTH PROFESSIONALS AND INDUSTRY Bioethical Issues Comprehension Drug Industry* Emergency Medicine* Ethics, Medical* Faculty, Medical Gift Giving Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice* Humans Internship and Residency Interprofessional Relations* Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








Far too large a section of the treatment of disease is to-day controlled by the big manufacturing pharmacists, who have enslaved us in a plausible pseudo-science...
The blind faith which some men have in medicines illustrates too often the greatest of all human capacities - the capacity for self deception...
Some one will say, Is this all your science has to tell us? Is this the outcome of decades of good clinical work, of patient study of the disease, of anxious trial in such good faith of so many drugs? Give us back the childlike trust of the fathers in antimony and in the lancet rather than this cold nihilism. Not at all! Let us accept the truth, however unpleasant it may be, and with the death rate staring us in the face, let us not be deceived with vain fancies...
we need a stern, iconoclastic spirit which leads, not to nihilism, but to an active skepticism - not the passive skepticism, born of despair, but the active skepticism born of a knowledge that recognizes its limitations and knows full well that only in this attitude of mind can true progress be made.
- William Osler 1909