corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 50

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: news

FDA Warns Heart-Bypass Patients Shouldn't Take Painkiller Bextra
The Wall Street Journal 2004 Dec 9


Full text:

The government is warning of potential heart problems associated with the use of Pfizer Inc.‘s painkiller Bextra in people who have recently had heart-bypass surgery.

The Food and Drug Administration said Thursday it is adding the warning to the labels of Bextra, as well as strengthening the label warnings to say that there is the possibility of severe skin reactions with the drug.

Patients who recently had the bypass surgery or who are allergic to sulfa products shouldn’t take Bextra, the agency said.

In October, Pfizer informed doctors that Bextra was associated with an increase in heart attacks and stroke in heart-bypass patients.

The FDA said in a statement that it was adding heart the warning to the Bextra label because “results from a new study of more than 1,500 patients who had just had cardiac surgery show that patients treated with Bextra for pain were more likely to have heart and blood clotting problems than other patients who did not receive any drug.”

The problems included heart attack, stroke and blood clots in the legs and the lungs, the FDA said.

It said the new label will indicate Bextra isn’t indicated for treatment of pain immediately following coronary bypass graft surgery.

However, the agency said: “While all drugs have risks, FDA believes that, based on what we know now, the overall benefit of Bextra outweighs the risk when used in properly selected patients as directed in the approved labeling.”

Bextra is a type of painkiller known as a cox-2 inhibitor. These drugs have become popular treatments for arthritis and other ailments.

However, Merck & Co.‘s Vioxx, another cox-2 inhibitor, was recently pulled from the market because of concerns about heart attack risk among users of the product. FDA is convening a panel in February to review all cox-2 inhibitors.

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








...to influence multinational corporations effectively, the efforts of governments will have to be complemented by others, notably the many voluntary organisations that have shown they can effectively represent society’s public-health interests…
A small group known as Healthy Skepticism; formerly the Medical Lobby for Appropriate Marketing) has consistently and insistently drawn the attention of producers to promotional malpractice, calling for (and often securing) correction. These organisations [Healthy Skepticism, Médecins Sans Frontières and Health Action International] are small, but they are capable; they bear malice towards no one, and they are inscrutably honest. If industry is indeed persuaded to face up to its social responsibilities in the coming years it may well be because of these associations and others like them.
- Dukes MN. Accountability of the pharmaceutical industry. Lancet. 2002 Nov 23; 360(9346)1682-4.