corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 478

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: media release

Press Release: Tangled Patent Linkages Reduce Stimulation for Pharmaceutical Innovation 6,730 patents for only 27 pharmaceutical inventions
European Generic Medicines Assocation 2004 Jun 1


Full text:

EGA highlighted the continued difficulties facing the European generics industry in making low-cost medicines available to patients and cash-strapped healthcare systems during its participation in the 7th Annual International Conference on Generic Pharmaceuticals in Prague on 28-30 June,

The increasing number of patents on minute and obscure aspects of pharmaceutical products is fast becoming the principle obstacle facing the industry. In the year 2000, for example, while the US Patent Office granted 6,730 pharmaceutical patents, the US Food and Drug Administration only registered 27 new chemical entities (NCE). This growing global trend is resulting in a tangled web of patents that creates a complex legal minefield protecting pharmaceutical inventions well-beyond a product’s basic patent.

Designed to delay the entry of market competition from lower-priced generic products, the practice also allows the originator industry to reap continued benefits from older products. This not only keeps the cost of medicines unnecessarily high, but more worryingly, it eliminates the stimulus needed by research companies to discover new cures for life-threatening illnesses.

Greg Perry, Director General of EGA said, “The growing trend of establishing numerous patents on superfluous aspects of pharmaceutical products for the sake of prolonging market exclusivity must not be allowed to become common practice in the EU. The current system of multiple patents is particularly worrying in the light of the newly adopted EU legislation on the enforcement of Intellectual Property protection which will allow automatic court injunctions against new generic products. The US experience of denying patients timely access to affordable medicines must not be repeated in Europe.”

Rory O’Riordan, President of EGA, said “The growing use of superfluous patents, frivolous lawsuits and damaging court injunctions against legitimate generic competition pose serious threats to the generic medicines industry and to the continued availability of affordable medicinal care for Europe’s patients. Increasing legal obstacles to the rapid availability of generic medicines is particularly disturbing as the overall use of generic medicines is still generally very low in Europe, compared to the 50-60% prescribing rate in the United States.
While many countries across greater Europe are taking measures to encourage the use of generic medicines, more must be done to simplify current patent structures to make equivalent generic products of newer medicines available to patients immediately upon the expiry of the basic patent.”

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








Far too large a section of the treatment of disease is to-day controlled by the big manufacturing pharmacists, who have enslaved us in a plausible pseudo-science...
The blind faith which some men have in medicines illustrates too often the greatest of all human capacities - the capacity for self deception...
Some one will say, Is this all your science has to tell us? Is this the outcome of decades of good clinical work, of patient study of the disease, of anxious trial in such good faith of so many drugs? Give us back the childlike trust of the fathers in antimony and in the lancet rather than this cold nihilism. Not at all! Let us accept the truth, however unpleasant it may be, and with the death rate staring us in the face, let us not be deceived with vain fancies...
we need a stern, iconoclastic spirit which leads, not to nihilism, but to an active skepticism - not the passive skepticism, born of despair, but the active skepticism born of a knowledge that recognizes its limitations and knows full well that only in this attitude of mind can true progress be made.
- William Osler 1909