corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 4667

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: Journal Article

Angel JE.
Publication of sponsored symposiums in medical journals.
N Engl J Med 1993 Apr 22; 328:(16):1196


Abstract:

Bero and colleagues use arbitrary measures to judge the purity of editorial material generated by seminars and symposiums funded by the pharmaceutical industry. The author suggests other questions as more appropriate for evaluating sponsored symposiums for publication.

Keywords:
*letter to the editor/United States/sponsored symposia & conferences/journal supplements/publication bias/quality of information/industry perspective/ATTITUDES REGARDING PROMOTION: INDUSTRY/INFLUENCE OF PROMOTION: PUBLICATION/PROMOTION DISGUISED: JOURNAL SUPPLEMENTS, CONTROLLED CIRCULATION JOURNALS AND NEWSLETTERS


Notes:

Reply to: Lisa A. Bero et al., New England Journal of Medicine 1992;327:1135-1140.
Reply from: Lisa A. Bero et al., New England Journal of Medicine 1992;328:1197-1198.
Conflict of interest: Jack Angel works for Coalition of Healthcare Communicators.

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








...to influence multinational corporations effectively, the efforts of governments will have to be complemented by others, notably the many voluntary organisations that have shown they can effectively represent society’s public-health interests…
A small group known as Healthy Skepticism; formerly the Medical Lobby for Appropriate Marketing) has consistently and insistently drawn the attention of producers to promotional malpractice, calling for (and often securing) correction. These organisations [Healthy Skepticism, Médecins Sans Frontières and Health Action International] are small, but they are capable; they bear malice towards no one, and they are inscrutably honest. If industry is indeed persuaded to face up to its social responsibilities in the coming years it may well be because of these associations and others like them.
- Dukes MN. Accountability of the pharmaceutical industry. Lancet. 2002 Nov 23; 360(9346)1682-4.