corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 4483

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: news

O’reilly D.
Drug doctors under fire
The Bulletin 1992 Mar 2420-21


Abstract:

Companies are spending $150-$200 million annually promoting drugs in Australia and between 16-31% of promotions are misleading. Two reports will be released in the next few weeks recommending tightening up on the industry’s self-regulatory code of behaviour. 40% of the promotion budget is spent on sales representatives who admit that they are trained in “psychological techniques” to get doctors on side. Doctors are also offered accomodation and travel packages for themselves and sometimes their spouses ot attend conferences, seminars and workshops. These may be hosted by drug companies and be nothing but thinly veiled promotions. The Australian Pharmaceutical Manufacturers Association denies that promotion is manipulative and that doctors are “highly qualified people and, like most technical people, are pretty analytical.”

Keywords:
*feature story/Australia/promotion costs and volume/sales representatives/ Australian Pharmaceutical Manufacturers Association/ industry perspective/ quality of information/ drug company sponsored meals and travel/ regulation of promotion/ATTITUDES REGARDING PROMOTION: HEALTH PROFESSIONALS/ATTITUDES REGARDING PROMOTION: INDUSTRY/ETHICAL ISSUES IN PROMOTION: GIFT GIVING/ETHICAL ISSUES IN PROMOTION: PAYMENT FOR MEALS, ACCOMODATION, TRAVEL, ENTERTAINMENT/PROMOTION DISGUISED: SUPPORT FOR CME/REGULATION, CODES, GUIDELINES: INDUSTRY SELF-REGULATION

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








Cases of wilful misrepresentation are a rarity in medical advertising. For every advertisement in which nonexistent doctors are called on to testify or deliberately irrelevant references are bunched up in [fine print], you will find a hundred or more whose greatest offenses are unquestioning enthusiasm and the skill to communicate it.

The best defence the physician can muster against this kind of advertising is a healthy skepticism and a willingness, not always apparent in the past, to do his homework. He must cultivate a flair for spotting the logical loophole, the invalid clinical trial, the unreliable or meaningless testimonial, the unneeded improvement and the unlikely claim. Above all, he must develop greater resistance to the lure of the fashionable and the new.
- Pierre R. Garai (advertising executive) 1963