corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 4361

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: news

Kawachi I.
Where’s the bite?—Six case studies of the voluntary regulation of pharmaceutical advertising and promotion
1992269-287


Abstract:

The first part of this chapter reviews the success and failures of voluntary regulation of pharmaceutical promotion in six countries: Australia, Canada, New Zealand, Sweden, United Kingdom and United States. The conclusion is that self-regulation has failed to curb promotional excesses. There is no country yet in which promotion is satisfactorily controlled by self-regulation. The second part of the chapter outlines some general recommendations for further improvements in regulating promotion. The first step is to set up a code that is comprehensive in its coverage of promotional practices and that is subject to amendment on a regular basis. Monitoring of compliance with the code must be done on a proactive basis rather than waiting for complaints about violations to arrive. Sanctions for code violations have to be effective in detering future violations. Finally, the public has to be involved in the disciplinary process.

Keywords:
*analysis/Australia/Canada/New Zealand/Sweden/United Kingdom/United States/regulation of promotion/ monitoring of compliance/REGULATION, CODES, GUIDELINES: COMPLIANCE, SANCTIONS, STANDARDS/REGULATION, CODES, GUIDELINES: DIRECT GOVERNMENT REGULATION/REGULATION, CODES, GUIDELINES: INDUSTRY SELF-REGULATION

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








...to influence multinational corporations effectively, the efforts of governments will have to be complemented by others, notably the many voluntary organisations that have shown they can effectively represent society’s public-health interests…
A small group known as Healthy Skepticism; formerly the Medical Lobby for Appropriate Marketing) has consistently and insistently drawn the attention of producers to promotional malpractice, calling for (and often securing) correction. These organisations [Healthy Skepticism, Médecins Sans Frontières and Health Action International] are small, but they are capable; they bear malice towards no one, and they are inscrutably honest. If industry is indeed persuaded to face up to its social responsibilities in the coming years it may well be because of these associations and others like them.
- Dukes MN. Accountability of the pharmaceutical industry. Lancet. 2002 Nov 23; 360(9346)1682-4.