corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 4064

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: Journal Article

Harvey K.
Pharmaceutical promotion.
Med J Aust 1990 Jan 15; 152:(2):57-8


Abstract:

Promotional material in Australia used to be examined by the Department of Community Services and Health for a two year period after marketing approval had been granted. As a consequence of the adoption of a code of marketing by the Australian Pharmaceutical Manufacturers Association, the Department offered the APMA a two year trial of self-regulation. The Department did nothing to evaluate prospectively the impact of its withdrawal from the regulatory process and did not identify performance indicators by which it intended to judge the outcome of this self-regulatory trial. The APMA code has major weaknesses but improvements have been made in the complaints process. Sanctions for breaching the code do not appear to have deterred companies from repeated violations. Rather than comply with sanctions Smith Kline & French resigned its membership in the Association although the resignation was later withdrawn. Failure of the industry to be able to self-regulate argues in favour of coregulation with the government providing legislative back-up when self-regulation fails.

Keywords:
*editorial/Australia/Australian Pharmaceutical Manufacturers Association/regulation of promotion/Smith Kline & French/REGULATION, CODES, GUIDELINES: COMPLIANCE, SANCTIONS, STANDARDS/REGULATION, CODES, GUIDELINES: DIRECT GOVERNMENT REGULATION/REGULATION, CODES, GUIDELINES: INDUSTRY SELF-REGULATION Advertising/standards* Australia Drug Industry/standards* Organizations

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








...to influence multinational corporations effectively, the efforts of governments will have to be complemented by others, notably the many voluntary organisations that have shown they can effectively represent society’s public-health interests…
A small group known as Healthy Skepticism; formerly the Medical Lobby for Appropriate Marketing) has consistently and insistently drawn the attention of producers to promotional malpractice, calling for (and often securing) correction. These organisations [Healthy Skepticism, Médecins Sans Frontières and Health Action International] are small, but they are capable; they bear malice towards no one, and they are inscrutably honest. If industry is indeed persuaded to face up to its social responsibilities in the coming years it may well be because of these associations and others like them.
- Dukes MN. Accountability of the pharmaceutical industry. Lancet. 2002 Nov 23; 360(9346)1682-4.