corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 4051

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: Journal Article

[No authors listed] Related Articles, Links Conflicts of interest in medical center/industry research relationships.
Council on Scientific Affairs and Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs.
JAMA 1990 May 23-30; 263:(20):2790-3


Abstract:

This statement outlines benefits and risks of medical centre/industry research relationships for clinical investigators, medical centres and corporations. It discusses the different types of relationships between medical centres and industry and points out that these may raise different kinds of issues. Ethical guidelines are proposed.
KIE: Increasingly research carried out in university medical centers is funded by biotechnology firms. This collaboration raises the issue of conflict between a researcher’s dedication to advancing medical knowledge and a researcher’s desire to increase his or her income. This report by the AMA’s Council on Scientific Affairs and the Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs discusses the risks and benefits of a collaborative relationship to each party. It describes the different types of arrangements that exist between researchers and industry, and identifies the problems that may arise when a researcher or a medical center has a direct financial interest in a research program. The report concludes with ethical guidelines and recommendations for avoiding potential or actual conflicts of interest.

Keywords:
*policy statement & guideline/United States/American Medical Association/AMA/conflict of interest/academic freedom/relationship between researchers, academic institutions and industry/drug company sponsored research Academic Medical Centers* American Medical Association Biomedical Research* Disclosure Ethics Committees, Clinical Ethics Committees, Research Ethics, Professional Federal Government Humans Industry* Interprofessional Relations* Research Personnel Risk Assessment* Risk Factors United States

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








Far too large a section of the treatment of disease is to-day controlled by the big manufacturing pharmacists, who have enslaved us in a plausible pseudo-science...
The blind faith which some men have in medicines illustrates too often the greatest of all human capacities - the capacity for self deception...
Some one will say, Is this all your science has to tell us? Is this the outcome of decades of good clinical work, of patient study of the disease, of anxious trial in such good faith of so many drugs? Give us back the childlike trust of the fathers in antimony and in the lancet rather than this cold nihilism. Not at all! Let us accept the truth, however unpleasant it may be, and with the death rate staring us in the face, let us not be deceived with vain fancies...
we need a stern, iconoclastic spirit which leads, not to nihilism, but to an active skepticism - not the passive skepticism, born of despair, but the active skepticism born of a knowledge that recognizes its limitations and knows full well that only in this attitude of mind can true progress be made.
- William Osler 1909