corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 4048

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: Journal Article

Chetley A.
A healthy business? World health and the pharmaceutical industry
Zed Books 1990;
http://www.amazon.com/Healthy-Business-Health-Pharmaceutical-Industry/dp/0862327350/ref=sr_1_1/102-1249992-1219339?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1174978013&sr=1-1


Abstract:

Companies generally spend about 20% of sales on promotion. One of the main reasons for this heavy spending is so that companies can differentiate their product from many other similar ones on the market. The code of practice from the International Federation of Pharmaceutical Manufacturers Associations contains vague generalizations that are difficult to interpret and are poorly enforced. The Medical Lobby for Appropriate Marketing demonstrated this when it submitted over two hundred complaints to the IFPMA. There are also serious problems with industry run voluntary codes in industrialized countries. The most important element in promotion is the sales representative. The information that these people give doctors is incomplete and in some cases they are told not to mention specific problems unless doctors ask about them. Competitions open to doctors are becoming another popular way of promoting products. The industry also funds clinical trials which are really designed to introduce drugs to doctors and boost prescribing. Companies sponsor continuing medical education events where information is presented with an industry bias. Companies have also started to take out ads in the mass media to encourage patients to ask their doctors for new medications. Whenever their products are criticized, either in the medical or mass media, companies have tried to intervene either to suppress publication or to bully their critics. There is good evidence for double standards in promotion between developing and developed countries.

Keywords:
*analysis/developing countries/developed countries/promotion costs and volume/International Federation of Pharmaceutical Manufacturers Associations/IFPMA/regulation of promotion/ Code of Pharmaceutical Marketing Practices (IFPMA)/MaLAM/Medical Lobby for Appropriate Marketing/sales representatives/corporate funding/CME/continuing medical education/ reaction to critics/ print advertisements/ direct-to-consumer advertising/ DTCA/ clinical trials/ drug company sponsored research/seeding studies/EVALUATION OF PROMOTION: COMPARISON BETWEEN DEVELOPING AND DEVELOPED COUNTRIES/EVALUATION OF PROMOTION: DETAILING/EVALUATION OF PROMOTION: DIRECT-TO-CONSUMER ADVERTISING/INFLUENCE OF PROMOTION: CONFERENCE SPEAKERS/INFLUENCE OF PROMOTION: PRESCRIBING, DRUG USE/PROMOTION AND HEALTH NEEDS: PROMOTION IN DEVELOPED COUNTRIES/PROMOTION AND HEALTH NEEDS: PROMOTION IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES/PROMOTION DISGUISED: CLINICAL TRIALS/PROMOTION DISGUISED: DISINFORMATION AND HARASSMENT/PROMOTION DISGUISED: PRESS CONFERENCES AND PRESS COVERAGE/PROMOTION DISGUISED: SUPPORT FOR CME/PROMOTIONAL TECHNIQUES: MISCELLANEOUS/REGULATION, CODES, GUIDELINES: COMPLIANCE, SANCTIONS, STANDARDS/REGULATION, CODES, GUIDELINES: INDUSTRY SELF-REGULATION/VOLUME OF AND EXPENDITURE ON PROMOTION

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








Far too large a section of the treatment of disease is to-day controlled by the big manufacturing pharmacists, who have enslaved us in a plausible pseudo-science...
The blind faith which some men have in medicines illustrates too often the greatest of all human capacities - the capacity for self deception...
Some one will say, Is this all your science has to tell us? Is this the outcome of decades of good clinical work, of patient study of the disease, of anxious trial in such good faith of so many drugs? Give us back the childlike trust of the fathers in antimony and in the lancet rather than this cold nihilism. Not at all! Let us accept the truth, however unpleasant it may be, and with the death rate staring us in the face, let us not be deceived with vain fancies...
we need a stern, iconoclastic spirit which leads, not to nihilism, but to an active skepticism - not the passive skepticism, born of despair, but the active skepticism born of a knowledge that recognizes its limitations and knows full well that only in this attitude of mind can true progress be made.
- William Osler 1909