corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 3994

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: Journal Article

Prescriptions for profit
1989 Mar 28;


Abstract:

The show looks at promotion techniques of pharmaceutical companies such as celebrity endorsements, running disease oriented television commercials and flying doctors to resorts for meetings. It looks at the way that Eli Lilly promoted Oraflex (benoxaprofen) and the way that McNeil promoted Zomax (zomepirac) including how McNeil reacted when it heard about side effects from Zomax and what it told its sales representatives to say and not say. It also examines the relationship between drug companies and doctors who do research for them and act as paid consultants.

Keywords:
*analysis/United States/Eli Lilly/ Opren and Oraflex/ McNeil/ drug company sponsored research/ drug company sponsored meals and travel/Zomax/Ciba-Geigy/Voltaren/ endorsements/ relationship between researchers, academic institutions and industry/ broadcast advertisements/ DTCA/ direct-to-consumer advertising/ sales representatives/ nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs/ NSAID/ATTITUDES REGARDING PROMOTION: CONSUMERS/PATIENTS/ETHICAL ISSUES IN PROMOTION: LINKS BETWEEN HEALTH PROFESSIONALS AND INDUSTRY/ETHICAL ISSUES IN PROMOTION: PAYMENT FOR MEALS, ACCOMODATION, TRAVEL, ENTERTAINMENT/EVALUATION OF PROMOTION: DETAILING/EVALUATION OF PROMOTION: DIRECT-TO-CONSUMER ADVERTISING/INFLUENCE OF PROMOTION: CONFERENCE SPEAKERS/INFLUENCE OF PROMOTION: PRESCRIBING, DRUG USE/PROMOTION BY THIRD PARTIES: HEALTH

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








Cases of wilful misrepresentation are a rarity in medical advertising. For every advertisement in which nonexistent doctors are called on to testify or deliberately irrelevant references are bunched up in [fine print], you will find a hundred or more whose greatest offenses are unquestioning enthusiasm and the skill to communicate it.

The best defence the physician can muster against this kind of advertising is a healthy skepticism and a willingness, not always apparent in the past, to do his homework. He must cultivate a flair for spotting the logical loophole, the invalid clinical trial, the unreliable or meaningless testimonial, the unneeded improvement and the unlikely claim. Above all, he must develop greater resistance to the lure of the fashionable and the new.
- Pierre R. Garai (advertising executive) 1963