Healthy Skepticism Library item: 3892
Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.
 
Publication type: news
Bridges A.
U.S. federal advisers reject strongest warnings on ADHD drugs
Associated Press 2006 Mar 23
http://bodyandhealth.canada.com/channel_health_news_details.asp?news_id=9561&news_channel_id=41&channel_id=41&rot=11
Keywords:
Ritalin ADHD FDA
Notes:
Ralph Faggotter’s Comments:
“ The panel, in simply recommending easier-to-understand language on the labels, broke with another
committee that had recommended last month that the drugs include the more dire warnings.”
One might have thought that the FDA would be erring on the side of caution in its approach.
Particularly when considering the nasty side-effects of a powerful drug which is taken by, and affects the minds of, millions of American children.
Don’t count on it!
Full text:
ASSOCIATED PRESS
By ANDREW BRIDGES,
Wed Mar 22, 6:59 PM ET
A federal advisory panel on Wednesday rejected recommending that popular
drugs used to treat attention deficit hyperactivity disorder should bear the
strongest type of warning of the potential cardiovascular and psychiatric
risks they pose.
The consensus move by the Food and Drug Administration’s pediatric advisory
committee leaves in doubt whether the agency will require the so-called
“black-box” labels on the drugs, which include Ritalin. The panel, in simply
recommending easier-to-understand language on the labels, broke with another
committee that had recommended last month that the drugs include the more
dire warnings.
The pediatric advisory committee, without voting, did recommend adding more
information to the labels for the benefit of doctors, patients and parents.
“I wouldn’t use the word ‘tougher,’ said panel chair Dr. Robert Nelson.
“‘Clearer.’”
The agency isn’t required to follow the advice of its advisory committees,
but usually does.
Nearly 3.3 million Americans age 19 and younger used an ADHD drug last year,
according to Medco Health Solutions Inc., a prescription drug benefit
program manager.
Psychiatrists and others had urged the committee to move cautiously before
recommending strengthened warnings of heart attacks, hallucinations and
other potential risks associated with the drugs.
In February, the FDA’s Drug Safety and Risk Management advisory committee
voted to recommend the agency add the strongest possible warning to some of
the drugs, in that case to alert doctors, patients and parents of the
uncertainty regarding the risk they may pose to the cardiovascular system.
The FDA then asked the pediatric panel to examine that same issue, as well
as reports that psychosis or mania can occur in some juvenile patients at
normal doses of any ADHD drug.
Adding black-box warnings to some or all the drugs, which also include
Adderall and Strattera, could cause more harm than good, some experts told
the panel prior to the vote. “I suggest confusion, polarizing viewpoints,
initial press hysteria. But then what?” asked Julie Zito, a University of
Maryland associate professor in pharmacy and psychiatry.
The FDA has struggled since last year with the question of how to
communicate the potential risks associated with ADHD drugs. Psychiatrists
and mental health advocates said leaving the disease untreated could rival
the risks the drugs may pose.
“It is important to not let the discussion of ADHD medications overshadow
the public health crisis of untreated mental health disorders in children,”
said Cynthia Wainscott of the National Mental Health Association. Her
16-year-old granddaughter has ADHD.
Ritalin is manufactured by Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp. and in generic
form by other companies; Adderall is made by Shire Pharmaceuticals Inc.; and
Strattera, which is produced by Eli Lilly and Co.
FDA officials say patients and doctors should be aware that the small number
of reported psychiatric events could represent side effects of the drugs,
although they cannot point to a definitive link. However, they noted a
“complete absence” of similar reports in children treated with dummy pills
during dozens of clinical trials of the drugs. In many children, the events
ceased once they stopped taking the drugs – and resumed in some once they
restarted. “That’s unlikely to be due to random chance, suggesting some
effect of the drugs,” said Dr. Andrew Mosholder, of the FDA’s division of
drug risk evaluation.
McNeil Consumer & Specialty Pharmaceuticals said in briefing documents that
it is customary to weigh the “therapeutic benefits and potential risks” of
treatment. The unit of Johnson & Johnson makes Concerta, a long-acting form
of methylphenidate, the drug in Ritalin. Novartis believes current Ritalin
labels are adequate, company medical safety director Dr. Todd Gruber said.
Jacqueline Bessner of Ishpeming, Mich., said her daughter, Leanne, 15,
hanged herself last year two months after starting treatment with Concerta.
Bessner said more black-box warnings would be useless without increased
counseling and monitoring of patients.
“It’s being handed out like it’s candy,” Bessner said of ADHD drugs. “It’s
too easily accessible.”
A different FDA panel planned to consider on Thursday an application by
Cephalon Inc. to sell its sleep-disorder drug Provigil, or modafinil, as an
ADHD treatment for children.
The FDA wants members of its psychopharmalogic drugs advisory committee to
examine that request, including whether serious skin rashes seen in children
treated with modafinil should merit special warnings, follow-up studies and
steps to limit the risk.