corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 3811

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: Journal Article

Gazarian M, Kaye KI.
The road to consensus: considerations for the safe use and prescribing of COX-2-specific inhibitors.
Med J Aust 2002 Nov 18; 177:(10):572-3


Abstract:

The authors, from NSW Therapeutic Assessment Group, in discussing the “what” of guideline development question the assertion by Edmonds et al. that formulation of precise indications for the use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs versus COX-2 specific inhibitors would generate interminable controversy. The NSW TAG successfully developed evidence-based recommendations on indications for the use of celecoxib without generating such controversy. The different experiences may partly be related to a difference in the initial level of consensus on the importance of the topic. The “how” of the process followed by Edmonds et al is not described in sufficient detail to enable systematic evaluation of its validity. Getting the right “who” is a prerequisite for getting the “how” right. Authors with significant conflicts of interest should be excluded from participating in guideline development. The rationale for arbitrary selection of members and inclusion of members from the pharmaceutical industry is not explicitly stated. These issues may have contributed to the difficulties the group experienced.

Keywords:
*letter to the editor/Australia/ Consensus Cyclooxygenase 2 Cyclooxygenase 2 Inhibitors Cyclooxygenase Inhibitors/adverse effects Cyclooxygenase Inhibitors/therapeutic use* Drug Utilization Review Evidence-Based Medicine Humans Isoenzymes/antagonists & inhibitors* Membrane Proteins Practice Guidelines/standards* Prescriptions, Drug/standards* Prostaglandin-Endoperoxide Synthases Safety

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








Far too large a section of the treatment of disease is to-day controlled by the big manufacturing pharmacists, who have enslaved us in a plausible pseudo-science...
The blind faith which some men have in medicines illustrates too often the greatest of all human capacities - the capacity for self deception...
Some one will say, Is this all your science has to tell us? Is this the outcome of decades of good clinical work, of patient study of the disease, of anxious trial in such good faith of so many drugs? Give us back the childlike trust of the fathers in antimony and in the lancet rather than this cold nihilism. Not at all! Let us accept the truth, however unpleasant it may be, and with the death rate staring us in the face, let us not be deceived with vain fancies...
we need a stern, iconoclastic spirit which leads, not to nihilism, but to an active skepticism - not the passive skepticism, born of despair, but the active skepticism born of a knowledge that recognizes its limitations and knows full well that only in this attitude of mind can true progress be made.
- William Osler 1909