corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 3781

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: Journal Article

Denneboom W, Dautzenberg MG, Grol R, De Smet PA.
User-related pharmaceutical care problems and factors affecting them: the importance of clinical relevance.
J Clin Pharm Ther 2005 Jun 01; 30:(3):215-23
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/utils/lofref.fcgi?PrId=3046&uid=15896238&db=pubmed&url=http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/openurl?genre=article&sid=nlm:pubmed&issn=0269-4727&date=2005&volume=30&issue=3&spage=215


Abstract:

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Many studies determined the number and nature of user-related Pharmaceutical Care Problems (PCP) and factors affecting them, but none considered the inclusion of clinical relevance. The aims of this study are (i) to investigate the type, number and clinical relevance of user-related PCP self-reported by home dwelling elderly on polypharmacy and (ii) to develop a risk-model for detecting elderly drug-users at risk of user-related PCP. METHODS: The study was a cross-sectional study conducted among 286 home dwelling elderly on polypharmacy (> or =75 years, > or =4 medicines) in the Netherlands. The user-related PCP found were divided into problem categories and subsequently a pharmacist and a general practitioner classified the problems into those with low and those with (potential) clinical relevance. Factors possibly associated with PCP (both for all and relevant problems) were identified, and subsequently tested in multivariate models using logistic regression. RESULTS: Three hundred and ninety-eight user-related PCP were observed in 189 patients (66% of all participants). After classification of user-related PCP only 26% appeared to be of clinical relevance (26% of all participants). When including clinical relevance a shift in predominantly present problem categories is observed. Furthermore, the risk model for problems with clinical relevance contains more factors than the model which considered all problems. Factors associated with clinically relevant PCP are emotional or physical problems interfering with social life, communication skills (vision and hearing), using tablets that have to be divided, using inhaled medicines, and the number of medicines used. This risk-model has a specificity of 92% and a sensitivity of 32%. CONCLUSIONS: Although user-related PCP were seen in about two-thirds of the participants, in only one out of four participants was the PCP considered to be of clinical relevance. With inclusion of clinical relevance, other problem categories become more dominant. A specific risk model is designed to select elderly patients that are most likely to have PCP in need of more urgent intervention. Unfortunately higher specificity is accompanied by low sensitivity in the present model.

Keywords:
Aged Aged, 80 and over Cognition Disorders/complications Community Pharmacy Services/statistics & numerical data* Cross-Sectional Studies Drug Labeling Female Humans Male Patient Compliance* Polypharmacy* Residence Characteristics Risk Factors Self Administration

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend