corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 3521

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: Journal Article

Tucker GK, Smith MC.
Direct-to-consumer advertising: Effects of different formats of warning information disclosure on cognitive reactions of adults
Journal of Pharmaceutical Marketing & Management 1987; 2:(1):27-41


Abstract:

The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of different formats of warning information disclosure in printed drug advertisements on a sample of adults’ cognitive reactions. Four mock advertisements for a fictitious influenza virus vaccine, all of which contained the same promotional message, were tested. The format of the warning disclosure varied in three of the advertisements. An advertisement which contained no warning message was also tested. Study subjects consisting of 192 patrons of a local shopping center each read one of the four advertisements and then completed a self-administered questionnaire that had 13 scaled items focusing on semantics. A sequence of analytical steps including factor analysis, analysis of variance and the Scheffe post-hoc multiple comparisons test suggest that the format of warning disclosure did have an effect on consumers’ cognitive reactions described by the informative value, security, and appeal factors. A trade-off appears to have resulted in the minds of those tested. Advertisements with any amount of warning information were viewed as appealing to those tested, yet the subjects were more reassured by those advertisements which contained only a general warning or no warning message at all.

Keywords:
*analytic survey/United States/DTCA/direct-to-consumer advertising/vaccines/warnings/EVALUATION OF PROMOTION: DIRECT-TO-CONSUMER ADVERTISING/PROMOTIONAL TECHNIQUES: DIRECT-TO-CONSUMER ADVERTISING

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








...to influence multinational corporations effectively, the efforts of governments will have to be complemented by others, notably the many voluntary organisations that have shown they can effectively represent society’s public-health interests…
A small group known as Healthy Skepticism; formerly the Medical Lobby for Appropriate Marketing) has consistently and insistently drawn the attention of producers to promotional malpractice, calling for (and often securing) correction. These organisations [Healthy Skepticism, Médecins Sans Frontières and Health Action International] are small, but they are capable; they bear malice towards no one, and they are inscrutably honest. If industry is indeed persuaded to face up to its social responsibilities in the coming years it may well be because of these associations and others like them.
- Dukes MN. Accountability of the pharmaceutical industry. Lancet. 2002 Nov 23; 360(9346)1682-4.