corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 3505

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: Journal Article

Editor .
The penalties of issuing misleading advertisements [Editor's response]
British Medical Journal 1987 Feb 14; 294:427


Abstract:

For many years the BMJ scrutinised all pharmaceutical advertisements and developed its own code of practice, the most important element of which was our insistence that statements of fact should be supported by trustworthy published evidence. When the Medicines Commission took on its own statutory duties we amended the code so that we allowed in advertisements any statements which appeared in the data sheet approved by the commission. For practical reasons our scrutiny has always been selective, but we nevertheless continue to challenge and on occasions refuse advertisements which do not conform to our standards. [full text]

Keywords:
*policy statement & guideline/United Kingdom/

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend