corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 3465

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: Journal Article

Speller DC.
The relationship between the Journal and the pharmaceutical industry.
J Antimicrob Chemother 1987 Jun; 19:(6):711-2


Abstract:

The Journal considers its position and its practices in the light of comments in the Report (1986) of the Royal College of Physicians. Articles all undergo peer review and there can be no doubt of the impartiality with which scientific contributions from workers within the pharmaceutical industry are processed. We have introduced the instructions that sources of financial support should be included in the Acknowledgements section, and approval by an ethical committee of work on human subjects should be stated. Papers are not published if they describe work on human or animal experimentation that would be ethically unacceptable. Advertisements are scrutinised for excessive or unsupported claims. The publishing of supplements on antimicrobial agents under development that are sponsored by the manufacturers has been reviewed previously but the topic is now reconsidered. Extensive details of the stringent rules and procedures applied by the Journal are given. We recognise the intrinsic dangers of sponsorship but believe that supplements are a useful part of the Journal’s role in furthering the relationship between physicians and the pharmaceutical industry.

Keywords:
*policy statement & guideline/United Kingdom/ Drug Industry* Great Britain Humans Interprofessional Relations Periodicals*

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








Cases of wilful misrepresentation are a rarity in medical advertising. For every advertisement in which nonexistent doctors are called on to testify or deliberately irrelevant references are bunched up in [fine print], you will find a hundred or more whose greatest offenses are unquestioning enthusiasm and the skill to communicate it.

The best defence the physician can muster against this kind of advertising is a healthy skepticism and a willingness, not always apparent in the past, to do his homework. He must cultivate a flair for spotting the logical loophole, the invalid clinical trial, the unreliable or meaningless testimonial, the unneeded improvement and the unlikely claim. Above all, he must develop greater resistance to the lure of the fashionable and the new.
- Pierre R. Garai (advertising executive) 1963