corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 3387

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: Journal Article

To what extent should pharmaceutical houses advertise to the public?
Pharmacy Times 1986 Mar; 52:(3):86-88, 90, 93


Abstract:

Thirty pharmacy leaders and practitioners recently participated in a Smith Kline & French symposium, ‘Pharmacists, Patients, and Madison Avenue’. Participants were overwhelmingly against DTCA. Other forms of public advertising, e.g. institutional ads, were considered acceptable. Opening remarks noted that the AMA was not in favor of DTCA, and the Pharmaceutical Manufacturers Association recently released a position paper protecting the physician-patient relationship, suggesting that it might also oppose DTCA. Eight brief speeches were made by: Fletcher (SK&F), Pierpaoli (American Society of Hospital Pharmacists), Scharringhausen (National Association of Retail Druggists), Briggs (National Association of Chain Drug Stores), Sesti (Michigan Pharmacists Association), Cammeyer (American Society of Consultant Pharmacists), Crawford (American Pharmaceutical Association), and Brown (American Association of Retired Persons). Then participants divided into three workshops: Is Direct-to-Consumer Advertising of Rx Drugs a Good Idea?; What Should Direct-to-Consumer Ads Say And Not Say?; and Pharmacy Issues in Consumer Advertising of Rx Drugs. Brief workshop reports are given. In the first workshop, there was consensus that DTCA would increase pressure on physicians to prescribe against their better judgement, and it was agreed that trying to educate consumers about drugs prior to the physician-patient relationship was of little value. It was also agreed that DTCA would blur the distinction between Rx and OTC drugs, that drugs should not be named in ads, and that DTCA could increase medical costs and lead to drug abuse.

Keywords:
*analysis/United States/

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








Far too large a section of the treatment of disease is to-day controlled by the big manufacturing pharmacists, who have enslaved us in a plausible pseudo-science...
The blind faith which some men have in medicines illustrates too often the greatest of all human capacities - the capacity for self deception...
Some one will say, Is this all your science has to tell us? Is this the outcome of decades of good clinical work, of patient study of the disease, of anxious trial in such good faith of so many drugs? Give us back the childlike trust of the fathers in antimony and in the lancet rather than this cold nihilism. Not at all! Let us accept the truth, however unpleasant it may be, and with the death rate staring us in the face, let us not be deceived with vain fancies...
we need a stern, iconoclastic spirit which leads, not to nihilism, but to an active skepticism - not the passive skepticism, born of despair, but the active skepticism born of a knowledge that recognizes its limitations and knows full well that only in this attitude of mind can true progress be made.
- William Osler 1909