corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 3311

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: Journal Article

FDA withdraws moratorium on direct-to-consumer advertising
American Pharmacy 1985 Nov 01; 25:(11):9-11


Abstract:

FDA has withdrawn the voluntary moratorium on DTCA of prescription drugs, with mixed signals from industry, including concern about expense and liability. But the climate may have changed with newly approved generics of former blockbusters. FDA gave two reasons for ending the moratorium: it was intended to allow time for dialogue among consumers, health professionals and industry, and time for research. Both had been realized. FDA will forego planned test programs. Advertisers will have to include brief summaries on side-effects and contraindications, which may deter them. Rep. John Dingell’s House Commerce Oversight and Investigations Committee appears to remain skeptical about DTCA’s value. FDA surveys found 80% of public meeting attendees opposed unregulated DTCA. Merrell Dow already plans a Nicorette campaign. Two vocal champions of DTCA are advertising firm Gross Townsend Frank and the Federal Trade Commission, which argued in the NEJM that it will facilitate a better match between patient and drug and that there is no certainty that advertising costs will have to be absorbed by consumers because less money may be spent on detailing. GTF president Alan Gross argues the value of TV ads for conditions such as hypertension and diabetes that can progress untreated for years, and warns industry to be prepared to incorporate TV advertising.

Keywords:
*analysis/United States/

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








Far too large a section of the treatment of disease is to-day controlled by the big manufacturing pharmacists, who have enslaved us in a plausible pseudo-science...
The blind faith which some men have in medicines illustrates too often the greatest of all human capacities - the capacity for self deception...
Some one will say, Is this all your science has to tell us? Is this the outcome of decades of good clinical work, of patient study of the disease, of anxious trial in such good faith of so many drugs? Give us back the childlike trust of the fathers in antimony and in the lancet rather than this cold nihilism. Not at all! Let us accept the truth, however unpleasant it may be, and with the death rate staring us in the face, let us not be deceived with vain fancies...
we need a stern, iconoclastic spirit which leads, not to nihilism, but to an active skepticism - not the passive skepticism, born of despair, but the active skepticism born of a knowledge that recognizes its limitations and knows full well that only in this attitude of mind can true progress be made.
- William Osler 1909