corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 3251

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: Journal Article

Joubert PH, Skene D.
Attitudes of private medical practitioners towards package inserts and other drug information sources.
S Afr Med J 1984 Aug 25; 66:(8):306-7
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/6474294


Abstract:

One thousand questionnaires were distributed to private medical practitioners by representatives of a pharmaceutical company. The 221 respondents were predominantly male (91%) and most were trained at the Universities of Pretoria (37%), the Witwatersrand (22%) and Cape Town (19%) during 1960 – 1969 (24%) and 1970 – 1979 (45%). The majority (72%) found package inserts useful or extremely useful and 70% had consulted one during the previous week or on the day that they completed the questionnaire. Reasons for consulting the package insert, in order of frequency, were for information on untoward effects (64%), indications (33%) and mechanism of action (33%). Most respondents (71%) used the Monthly Index of Specialities (MIMS) more often than package inserts and 53% used the MIMS desk reference more often than package inserts. As regards additional regular information on drugs, 67% preferred a regular book to a loose-leaf system and 69% were prepared to pay for it. We are of the opinion that there is a need for information on drugs that would be complementary to current information systems, and that this should be a joint venture between Government and private enterprise, with the consumer being prepared to share the cost.

Keywords:
*cross-sectional study/South Africa/EVALUATION OF PROMOTION: COMMERCIAL DRUG COMPENDIA/INFORMATION FROM INDUSTRY: DOCTORS/PROMOTIONAL TECHNIQUES: PACKAGE INSERTS Adult Attitude of Health Personnel* Drug Packaging* Female Humans Male Physicians, Family Questionnaires South Africa Statistics

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








Cases of wilful misrepresentation are a rarity in medical advertising. For every advertisement in which nonexistent doctors are called on to testify or deliberately irrelevant references are bunched up in [fine print], you will find a hundred or more whose greatest offenses are unquestioning enthusiasm and the skill to communicate it.

The best defence the physician can muster against this kind of advertising is a healthy skepticism and a willingness, not always apparent in the past, to do his homework. He must cultivate a flair for spotting the logical loophole, the invalid clinical trial, the unreliable or meaningless testimonial, the unneeded improvement and the unlikely claim. Above all, he must develop greater resistance to the lure of the fashionable and the new.
- Pierre R. Garai (advertising executive) 1963