corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 3226

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: Journal Article

Survey: Consumers don't favor prescription drug advertising
American Pharmacy 1984 Jan 01; 24:(1):10


Abstract:

80% of 950 people attending FDA hearings reported opposing unregulated advertising of prescription drugs. Of these, 60% totally opposed advertising; 20% opposed it unless strictly government regulated; 20% supported DTCA. Alexander Grant, chief of FDA’s Office of Consumer Affairs, concluded that consumers want to participate in policy development as DTCA evolves. The results have been questioned by some FDA officials because only people interested in consumer affairs attended. DTCA opponents feared that it would increase drug prices, mislead the public, disrupt patient-physician relationships, increase unnecessary use of drugs, present an unbalanced picture of risks and benefits, and unfairly favor drug companies with large advertising budgets. Several people noted that the elderly would be at special risk since they are particularly vulnerable to gimmickry and unable to read fine print describing side effects and contraindications. Those who approved of DTCA thought FDA should prohibit ads for brand-name products, drugs for serious conditions like arthritis, depression, or cardiovascular disease (but they felt that ads for easily understood products like vaccines would be acceptable), and new drugs not yet evaluated by physicians. They felt that DTCA would educate patients about specific risks and benefits, familiarize patients about drugs, and lower drug prices by increasing competition.

Keywords:
*cross-sectional study/United States/

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








...to influence multinational corporations effectively, the efforts of governments will have to be complemented by others, notably the many voluntary organisations that have shown they can effectively represent society’s public-health interests…
A small group known as Healthy Skepticism; formerly the Medical Lobby for Appropriate Marketing) has consistently and insistently drawn the attention of producers to promotional malpractice, calling for (and often securing) correction. These organisations [Healthy Skepticism, Médecins Sans Frontières and Health Action International] are small, but they are capable; they bear malice towards no one, and they are inscrutably honest. If industry is indeed persuaded to face up to its social responsibilities in the coming years it may well be because of these associations and others like them.
- Dukes MN. Accountability of the pharmaceutical industry. Lancet. 2002 Nov 23; 360(9346)1682-4.