corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 3113

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: book

Muller M.
The health of nations: a north-south investigation
: Faber and Faber 1982


Abstract:

(Limited to the parts dealing with promotion.) There is good evidence that there are double standards in promotion between developed and developing countries. The International Federation of Pharmaceutical Manufacturers Associations claims that it is not in the best interest of companies to communicate misleading or inaccurate data and that competing manufacturers will detect it quickly and object. However, this defence ignores the fact that all manufacturers of a particular class of product have an interest in staying silent because if one raised objections the market for all would be affected. Companies also claim that disagreement among national regulatory authorities regarding the legal requirements for labeling causes differences in the amount of information that companies give. Where differences exist these are usually due to the lack of resources in the developing countries.

Keywords:
*analysis/developing countries/developed countries/quality of information/regulation of promotion/IFPMA/International Federation of Pharmaceutical Manufacturers Associations/ regulatory authorities/ATTITUDES REGARDING PROMOTION: INDUSTRY/EVALUATION OF PROMOTION: COMPARISON BETWEEN DEVELOPING AND DEVELOPED COUNTRIES/PROMOTION AND HEALTH NEEDS: PROMOTION IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES/REGULATION, CODES, GUIDELINES: COMPLIANCE, SANCTIONS, STANDARDS/REGULATION, CODES, GUIDELINES: INDUSTRY SELF-REGULATION

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








...to influence multinational corporations effectively, the efforts of governments will have to be complemented by others, notably the many voluntary organisations that have shown they can effectively represent society’s public-health interests…
A small group known as Healthy Skepticism; formerly the Medical Lobby for Appropriate Marketing) has consistently and insistently drawn the attention of producers to promotional malpractice, calling for (and often securing) correction. These organisations [Healthy Skepticism, Médecins Sans Frontières and Health Action International] are small, but they are capable; they bear malice towards no one, and they are inscrutably honest. If industry is indeed persuaded to face up to its social responsibilities in the coming years it may well be because of these associations and others like them.
- Dukes MN. Accountability of the pharmaceutical industry. Lancet. 2002 Nov 23; 360(9346)1682-4.