corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 3082

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: Journal Article

Meadows R.
Communicating new drug information—the medium is the message
Drug Information Journal 1981; 15:11-15


Abstract:

A heavy financial commitment through detailing, journal ads, mailings, samples, etc. is marshalled behind a high potential new product with the expectation of some return within the first 5 years. Detailing is the most significant industry expense, responsible for about 70% of all promotional money spent. Symposia and “seeding” trials seem to be extremely effective ways of passing on the “good word” about a new or established drug. In a random sample of health professionals, sales representatives were rated fifth in order of frequency of use as an information source. Physicians may be influenced more by commercial sources of information than they are publicly willing to admit. There is also little doubt that the evidence thus far points to the success of commercial sources in at least creating awareness of a new drug.

Keywords:
*analysis/Canada/United States/quality of prescribing/sales representatives/doctors/pharmacies and pharmacists/patients/value of promotion/promotion costs and volume/industry perspective/ATTITUDES REGARDING PROMOTION: INDUSTRY/INFLUENCE OF PROMOTION: PRESCRIBING, DRUG USE/PROMOTION AS A SOURCE OF INFORMATION: DOCTORS/PROMOTIONAL TECHNIQUES: DETAILING/VOLUME OF AND EXPENDITURE ON PROMOTION

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








...to influence multinational corporations effectively, the efforts of governments will have to be complemented by others, notably the many voluntary organisations that have shown they can effectively represent society’s public-health interests…
A small group known as Healthy Skepticism; formerly the Medical Lobby for Appropriate Marketing) has consistently and insistently drawn the attention of producers to promotional malpractice, calling for (and often securing) correction. These organisations [Healthy Skepticism, Médecins Sans Frontières and Health Action International] are small, but they are capable; they bear malice towards no one, and they are inscrutably honest. If industry is indeed persuaded to face up to its social responsibilities in the coming years it may well be because of these associations and others like them.
- Dukes MN. Accountability of the pharmaceutical industry. Lancet. 2002 Nov 23; 360(9346)1682-4.