corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 3055

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: Journal Article

Joan SW.
Keeping prescription drug advertising honest: FDA's watchful eye
American Pharmacy 1980 May; 20:(5):40-44


Abstract:

Pharmaceutical manufacturers spend nearly $2 billion on advertising annually, regulated by a tiny division of the Food and Drug Administration whose staff is almost half pharmacists. The Division of Drug Advertising consists of Director Peter Rheinstein, and nine staff. It handles nearly 1000 complaints, submissions and inquiries a month. DDA takes hundreds of regulatory and advisory actions every year. Ads are not subject to preclearance, but all new promotional material for products with New Drug Applications must be submitted to the FDA. Sometimes manufacturers seek prior advice. But most DDA activities are remedial. The most common remedy is a notice of violation. Other remedies include seizure of misbranded drugs, injunction, and criminal prosecution. The most effective way to notify health practitioners about advertising violations is a ‘Dear Doctor’ letter, but postage is expensive, so they are reserved for fairly significant violations. Last year one was sent. Remedial ads require publication of boxed statements saying they are replacing ads found misleading by the FDA. Keeping the FDA happy is not simple. The government/manufacturer relationship is one of friendly adversaries. FDA’s approach to violations varies from polite to autocratic. One type of letter is low-key advisory letters; another type is regulatory letters that become part of the public record. DDA also has ongoing research projects focusing on whether ads are misleading. Another activity is trend analysis. Notable trends include targeting of pharmacists, and generic versus brand-name advertising, and DTCA. DDA staff monitor 80-odd professional journals and handle complaints received through the Drug Defect Reporting System and even get input from competing companies. Staff also meet with foreign counterparts. A pharmacy background is extremely useful for staff, but medical officers are consulted.

Keywords:
analysis/United States/

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








What these howls of outrage and hurt amount to is that the medical profession is distressed to find its high opinion of itself not shared by writers of [prescription] drug advertising. It would be a great step forward if doctors stopped bemoaning this attack on their professional maturity and began recognizing how thoroughly justified it is.
- Pierre R. Garai (advertising executive) 1963