corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 2899

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: Journal Article

Rheinstein PH, Mazis MB.
Regulation of O-T-C drug advertising: the FDA "prescription".
J Am Pharm Assoc 1976 Sep; 16:(9):505-6,


Abstract:

In recent years there has been increasing regulatory interest in OTC drug promotion, partly due to the FDA’s review of OTC drug labeling claims. The Federal Trade Commission retains primary regulatory responsibility. Since 1962, FDA has overseen prescription drug promotion. Recognising the close relationship between the two issues, FTC recently proposed rules requiring OTC marketers to adhere more closely to FDA-approved labeling indications and warnings. This paper provides FDA’s perspective on OTC drug regulation. Economists have noted at least two benefits of truthful and informative advertising: it disseminates information and it facilitates competition. However, government regulation of false and misleading advertising is important. Particular concern exists about promotion of OTC drugs because they are bought without prescription. Further concern exists because certain segments of the population may be particularly vulnerable to advertising. Critics have argued that OTC ads contribute to accidental ingestion of drugs by children, but there is no solid evidence. Another accusation is that OTC ads contribute to permissive use of drugs, but the evidence is unclear. OTC ads may encourage overuse of sedatives etc. It is argued also that there are insufficient warnings. The history and relevance of the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act is briefly discussed.

Keywords:
*analysis/United States/Advertising* Drugs, Non-Prescription* Legislation, Drug United States United States Food and Drug Administration*

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








Cases of wilful misrepresentation are a rarity in medical advertising. For every advertisement in which nonexistent doctors are called on to testify or deliberately irrelevant references are bunched up in [fine print], you will find a hundred or more whose greatest offenses are unquestioning enthusiasm and the skill to communicate it.

The best defence the physician can muster against this kind of advertising is a healthy skepticism and a willingness, not always apparent in the past, to do his homework. He must cultivate a flair for spotting the logical loophole, the invalid clinical trial, the unreliable or meaningless testimonial, the unneeded improvement and the unlikely claim. Above all, he must develop greater resistance to the lure of the fashionable and the new.
- Pierre R. Garai (advertising executive) 1963