corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 2713

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: Journal Article

Lee PR, Lurie P, Silverman MM, Lydecker M.
Drug promotion and labeling in developing countries: an update.
J Clin Epidemiol 1991; 44:


Abstract:

Recent studies of drug promotion and labeling in Third World countries since 1972 have observed important changes in the policies of multinational corporations. Earlier studies found that multinational and national drug companies often grossly exaggerated the indications for the drugs and minimized or ignored the hazards. In the latest study, initiated in 1987, considerable improvement in promotional practices of the multinational corporations has been found, but little or no improvement on the part of the national companies. As a result, physicians are still provided with grossly exaggerated claims and the hazards of prescription drugs are covered up or glossed over. A very serious problem—the marketing of fraudulent drug products—has been identified in a number of Third World countries. Drug products are shaped and colored to resemble the original multinational company product, but contain only a small percentage of the active ingredient stated on the label, or perhaps none at all. In Indonesia fraudulent drug products may represent 20-30% of all drug products in the market. Similar fraudulent products have been reported in Brazil, Thailand, Bangladesh and Malaysia.

Keywords:
*analysis/developing countries/commercial compendia/research-based manufacturers/domestic companies/Health Action International/ HAI/ IFPMA/ International Federation of Pharmaceutical Manufacturers Associations/ regulation of promotion/ Medical Lobby for Appropriate Marketing/ MaLAM/ Code of Pharmaceutical Marketing Practices (IFPMA)/consumer groups/EVALUATION OF PROMOTION: COMMERCIAL DRUG COMPENDIA/EVALUATION OF PROMOTION: COMPARISON BETWEEN DEVELOPING AND DEVELOPED COUNTRIES/PROMOTION AND HEALTH NEEDS: PROMOTION IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES/REGULATION, CODES, GUIDELINES: INDUSTRY SELF-REGULATION Developing Countries* Drug Industry Drug Labeling* Fraud* Humans Marketing of Health Services/methods* World Health Organization


Notes:

This paper presents the preliminary results of the fourth survey on drug promotion in the developing world that was undertaken by Philip Lee, Milton Silverman and Mia Lydecker. Most multinational firms are more willing to restrict claims of efficacy for their products to the scientifically justifiable and appear more willing to divulge the major hazards of their products. However, domestic firms have not changed their policies and practices. An additional problem is the willingness of domestic companies to promote drugs that were removed from the market by multinational corporations. While changes in the prescribing guides may be significant, advertising through other methods and prescribing practices in the localsetting may be little altered.

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








Far too large a section of the treatment of disease is to-day controlled by the big manufacturing pharmacists, who have enslaved us in a plausible pseudo-science...
The blind faith which some men have in medicines illustrates too often the greatest of all human capacities - the capacity for self deception...
Some one will say, Is this all your science has to tell us? Is this the outcome of decades of good clinical work, of patient study of the disease, of anxious trial in such good faith of so many drugs? Give us back the childlike trust of the fathers in antimony and in the lancet rather than this cold nihilism. Not at all! Let us accept the truth, however unpleasant it may be, and with the death rate staring us in the face, let us not be deceived with vain fancies...
we need a stern, iconoclastic spirit which leads, not to nihilism, but to an active skepticism - not the passive skepticism, born of despair, but the active skepticism born of a knowledge that recognizes its limitations and knows full well that only in this attitude of mind can true progress be made.
- William Osler 1909