corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 2572

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: Journal Article

Bero L.
'Educational' advertisements - I haven't seen one yet!
Western Journal of Medicine 2001 Jun; 174:395


Abstract:

Since perestroika, Russian physicians have been exposed to drug advertisements in medical journals. The ads are characterized by a lack of information on indications, safety, drug interactions, and supporting resources (Vlassov et al. 2001), as is the case in the United States and other countries. Drug companies could link ads to resources with more detailed information. However, they respond slowly or not at all to requests for additional information, which is often from non-peer-reviewed, industry-sponsored studies. Ads are only one aspect of promotion, which is often disguised as education. Vlassov et al. could do a follow-up study analysing journal reprints, pamphlets etc. that are given to Russian physicians. They are likely to be promotional rather than educational, and are likely to fail to provide important information about drugs. Drug ads do not meet the standard of the International Federation of Pharmaceutical Manufacturers Association, the Food and Drug Administration, or the World Health Organization. Physicians must learn to seek information elsewhere. By critically appraising drug ads and other sources of information, physicians can use their time effectively to keep up to date on drug therapies.

Keywords:
*analysis Russia United States drug advertisements indications International Federation of Pharmaceutical Manufacturers Association Food and Drug Administration World Health Organization EVALUATION OF PROMOTION: JOURNAL ADVERTISEMENTS PROMOTION DISGUISED: PHYSICIAN EDUCATIONAL MATERIAL AND GUIDELINES PROMOTIONAL TECHNIQUES: JOURNAL ADVERTISEMENTS REGULATIONS, CODES, GUIDELINES: INDUSTRY SELF-REGULATION REGULATIONS, CODES, GUIDELINES: INTERNATIONAL CODES


Notes:

Commentary on 21380 (Vlassov et al. 2002)

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








...to influence multinational corporations effectively, the efforts of governments will have to be complemented by others, notably the many voluntary organisations that have shown they can effectively represent society’s public-health interests…
A small group known as Healthy Skepticism; formerly the Medical Lobby for Appropriate Marketing) has consistently and insistently drawn the attention of producers to promotional malpractice, calling for (and often securing) correction. These organisations [Healthy Skepticism, Médecins Sans Frontières and Health Action International] are small, but they are capable; they bear malice towards no one, and they are inscrutably honest. If industry is indeed persuaded to face up to its social responsibilities in the coming years it may well be because of these associations and others like them.
- Dukes MN. Accountability of the pharmaceutical industry. Lancet. 2002 Nov 23; 360(9346)1682-4.