corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 2531

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: Journal Article

Kimmey JR.
Drug efficacy and a journal's responsibility.
Am J Public Health 1972 Apr; 62:(4):461-2


Abstract:

The National Academy of Sciences/National Research Council has found that many drugs that were marketed prior to 1962 are ineffective. However, until the Food and Drug Administration has issued a final order to change the labeling on these drugs manufacturers can continue to advertise their drugs without notifying physicians of the findings of the NAS/NRC. Even if manufacturers do not advertise their products physicians will continue to prescribe them on the basis of earlier advertising concerning their effectiveness. The American Journal of Public Health believes that it has a duty to inform doctors about the NAS/NRC findings and will publish these in the journal.

Keywords:
*editorial/United States/American Journal of Public Health/Food and Drug Administration/journal advertisements/quality of information/ATTITUDES REGARDING PROMOTION: MEDICAL JOURNALS MeSH Terms: Advertising Drug Industry Ethics, Professional Legislation, Drug Periodicals* Pharmaceutical Preparations/standards* United States United States Food and Drug Administration


Notes:

Dr. Kimmey is managing editor of American Journal of Public Health.

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








...to influence multinational corporations effectively, the efforts of governments will have to be complemented by others, notably the many voluntary organisations that have shown they can effectively represent society’s public-health interests…
A small group known as Healthy Skepticism; formerly the Medical Lobby for Appropriate Marketing) has consistently and insistently drawn the attention of producers to promotional malpractice, calling for (and often securing) correction. These organisations [Healthy Skepticism, Médecins Sans Frontières and Health Action International] are small, but they are capable; they bear malice towards no one, and they are inscrutably honest. If industry is indeed persuaded to face up to its social responsibilities in the coming years it may well be because of these associations and others like them.
- Dukes MN. Accountability of the pharmaceutical industry. Lancet. 2002 Nov 23; 360(9346)1682-4.