corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 2517

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: news

Cresswell A.
GP education filled with 'propaganda'
The Australian Newspaper 2005 Sep 13
http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/common/story_page/0,5744,16583953%255E23289,00.html


Notes:

Ralph Faggotter’s Comments: CPD in Australia is supposed to stand for ‘Continuing Professional Development’ but since 90% of post-graduate medical education for GPs is organised and paid for by drug companies, it should stand for ‘Constant Pushing of Drugs’.


Full text: GP education filled with ‘propaganda’ Adam Cresswell, Health editor September 13, 2005

DRUG companies have “hijacked” education sessions for general practitioners by feeding them industry spin instead of science, doctors say.

As new concerns emerged over the credibility of the Continuing Professional Development scheme designed to keep GPs’ skills up to date, several doctors warned that the information given at pharmaceutical company meetings was unreliable and doctors were being “propagandised” by the drug industry.

Educational meetings organised by drug giants often highlighted positive information about the companies’ products and glossed over or suppressed negative information, or information about alternative treatments, several GPs told The Australian.

They said some GPs routinely fell asleep at meetings, went sightseeing during conference sessions or paid little heed to educational updates.

Sydney GP Con Costa said many doctors chose which talk to attend according to whether they liked the restaurant chosen as the venue, rather than the subject matter.

“I’m sure if the education was better quality, I’m sure they would stay awake,” he said.

Perth GP Joe Kosterich said CPD had “become a play thing of big pharma” and information was selected to offer a positive spin of companies’ products.

GPs are encouraged to attend education meetings through a points system, which ensures doctors continue to be entitled to higher Medicare rebates once they have accrued 130 points over a three-year period.

Opposition health spokeswoman Julia Gillard last night called on federal Health Minister Tony Abbott to demand “a very serious ‘please explain”’ from the Royal Australian College of General Practitioners, which oversees the CPD program.

“If there’s any suggestion that what’s being done at the moment is token or biased by the involvement of pharmaceutical companies, my view would be that needs to be sorted out as a matter of urgency,” she said.

The call followed a report in The Weekend Australian that the RACGP had allocated 30 points – almost a quarter of the number needed over three years – for a one-day seminar on “GP wealth creation”.

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








Cases of wilful misrepresentation are a rarity in medical advertising. For every advertisement in which nonexistent doctors are called on to testify or deliberately irrelevant references are bunched up in [fine print], you will find a hundred or more whose greatest offenses are unquestioning enthusiasm and the skill to communicate it.

The best defence the physician can muster against this kind of advertising is a healthy skepticism and a willingness, not always apparent in the past, to do his homework. He must cultivate a flair for spotting the logical loophole, the invalid clinical trial, the unreliable or meaningless testimonial, the unneeded improvement and the unlikely claim. Above all, he must develop greater resistance to the lure of the fashionable and the new.
- Pierre R. Garai (advertising executive) 1963