corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 2448

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: Journal Article

Isidor JM, Kaltman SP.
Fast track to disaster? Considerations raised by the current recruitment techniques for clinical research subjects
J Biolaw Bus 2002; 5:(3):46-7
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=pubmed&dopt=Abstract&list_uids=12816118


Abstract:

Efforts to obtain Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval of new drugs on a “fast track” are not without hazards for physicians and other providers involved in conducting clinical research. Increasingly, research sponsors have implemented competitive subject recruitment techniques that encourage investigators and their staffs to move studies along rapidly, but may also raise concerns about subject safety. The purpose of this article is to examine competitive recruitment practices and to examine the ethical and legal issues related to obtaining information consent for clinical research within this current framework.

Keywords:
Clinical Trials*/ethics Coercion Competitive Behavior Drug Industry Human Experimentation*/ethics Humans Informed Consent/ethics Liability, Legal Research Personnel/legislation & jurisprudence Research Subjects/supply & distribution* Research Support/economics United States analysis United States FDA Food and Drug Administration clinical trials drug company sponsored research relationship between researchers, academic institutions and industry conflict-of-interest safety of participants informed consent ETHICAL ISSUES IN PROMOTION: ETHICS OF TRIALS REGULATIONS, CODES, GUIDELINES: DIRECT GOVERNMENT REGULATION SPONSORSHIP: RESEARCH

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








...to influence multinational corporations effectively, the efforts of governments will have to be complemented by others, notably the many voluntary organisations that have shown they can effectively represent society’s public-health interests…
A small group known as Healthy Skepticism; formerly the Medical Lobby for Appropriate Marketing) has consistently and insistently drawn the attention of producers to promotional malpractice, calling for (and often securing) correction. These organisations [Healthy Skepticism, Médecins Sans Frontières and Health Action International] are small, but they are capable; they bear malice towards no one, and they are inscrutably honest. If industry is indeed persuaded to face up to its social responsibilities in the coming years it may well be because of these associations and others like them.
- Dukes MN. Accountability of the pharmaceutical industry. Lancet. 2002 Nov 23; 360(9346)1682-4.