corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 2442

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: Journal Article

King T.
The escalating demand for long-term care.
Can Nurse 2005 Jun; 101:(6):11-5
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=pubmed&dopt=Abstract&list_uids=16121471&query_hl=10


Abstract:

The growing demand for more long-term care (LTC) services for older adults does not appear to be matched by an investigation of the causes of the demand. Older adults are immensely diverse and may have compromised function due to a combination of causes, including normal aging, psychosocial and environmental conditions, new or existing chronic illness, acute disease and the adverse effects of drugs and other treatments. Unfortunately, most health-care professionals (HCPs) lack gerontological preparation and may therefore be unable to understand and meet older adults’ needs or to critique the quality of their care and comprehend its consequences. HCPs who provide uninformed care may erode older adults’ holistic health and contribute to their decline into LTC. A major shortfall in older adults’ care is mistaken assumptions about what physical and mental changes are normal with aging and a subsequent lack of attention to the underlying causes of signs and symptoms. Gerontologically uninformed pharmacological practices may also harm older adults’ health and increase the need for LTC. Hospitalization itself is a major risk for older adults, often unnecessarily precipitating a permanent move to LTC. The medical model, ageism and other socio-political conditions all put constraints on the care of older adults and promote LTC over health promotion and protection. Ways to enrich older adults’ care include expert gerontological attention for those now in LTC, stakeholder inclusion in decision-making about gerontological care and policy, education for all stakeholders including HCPs (both practising and students), communication with members of Parliament and the public about gerontological needs, administrative support, a broader model of care, gerontological standards of care and comprehensive programs of gerontological care.

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








...to influence multinational corporations effectively, the efforts of governments will have to be complemented by others, notably the many voluntary organisations that have shown they can effectively represent society’s public-health interests…
A small group known as Healthy Skepticism; formerly the Medical Lobby for Appropriate Marketing) has consistently and insistently drawn the attention of producers to promotional malpractice, calling for (and often securing) correction. These organisations [Healthy Skepticism, Médecins Sans Frontières and Health Action International] are small, but they are capable; they bear malice towards no one, and they are inscrutably honest. If industry is indeed persuaded to face up to its social responsibilities in the coming years it may well be because of these associations and others like them.
- Dukes MN. Accountability of the pharmaceutical industry. Lancet. 2002 Nov 23; 360(9346)1682-4.