corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 2401

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: Journal Article

Lachin JM.
Conflicts of interest in data monitoring of industry versus publicly financed clinical trials.
Stat Med 2004 May 30; 23:(10):1519-21
http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/abstract/108561304/ABSTRACT


Abstract:

The FDA Guidance, while highly appropriate for industry sponsored trials, need not be imposed on publicly (e.g. NIH) financed clinical trials. While the potential for conflicts of interest exist in the latter, they are in general manageable and pose an acceptable low risk of threatening the integrity of a study. However, the Guidance should heighten the awareness of all investigators in public trials to the potential for the appearance of conflicts and to the need for full and open participation in the management of dualities of interest. Copyright 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Keywords:
MeSH Terms: Clinical Trials/economics Clinical Trials/ethics* Clinical Trials/standards Clinical Trials Data Monitoring Committees/ethics* Clinical Trials Data Monitoring Committees/standards Conflict of Interest* Data Interpretation, Statistical Drug Industry/economics Drug Industry/ethics* Drug Industry/standards Ethics, Professional Financing, Government Guidelines Humans National Institutes of Health (U.S.)/ethics* National Institutes of Health (U.S.)/standards Statistics/ethics* United States United States Food and Drug Administration/ethics* United States Food and Drug Administration/standards

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








...to influence multinational corporations effectively, the efforts of governments will have to be complemented by others, notably the many voluntary organisations that have shown they can effectively represent society’s public-health interests…
A small group known as Healthy Skepticism; formerly the Medical Lobby for Appropriate Marketing) has consistently and insistently drawn the attention of producers to promotional malpractice, calling for (and often securing) correction. These organisations [Healthy Skepticism, Médecins Sans Frontières and Health Action International] are small, but they are capable; they bear malice towards no one, and they are inscrutably honest. If industry is indeed persuaded to face up to its social responsibilities in the coming years it may well be because of these associations and others like them.
- Dukes MN. Accountability of the pharmaceutical industry. Lancet. 2002 Nov 23; 360(9346)1682-4.