corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 2385

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: Journal Article

Friedman LS, Richter ED.
Relationship between conflicts of interest and research results.
J Gen Intern Med 2004 Jan; 19:(1):51-6
http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1525-1497.2004.30617.x?cookieSet=1


Abstract:

CONTEXT: To date, research regarding the influence of conflicts of interest on the presentation of findings by researchers has been limited. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the sources of funding for published manuscripts, and association between reported findings and conflicts of interest. METHODS: Data from both print and electronic issues of The New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM) and The Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) were analyzed for sources of funding, areas of investigation, conflict of interest (COI), and presentation of results. We reviewed all original manuscripts published during the year 2001 within NEJM (N = 193) and JAMA (N = 205). We use 3 definitions for COI in this paper: a broadly defined criterion, the criterion used by The International Council of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE), and a criterion defined by the authors. RESULTS: Depending on the COI criteria used, 16.6% to 32.6% of manuscripts had 1 or more author with COI. Based on ICMJE criterion, 38.7% of studies investigating drug treatments had authors with COI. We observed a strong association between those studies whose authors had COI and reported positive findings (P <.001). When controlling for sample size, study design, and country of primary authors, we observed a strong association between positive results and COI (ICMJE definition) among all treatment studies (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 2.35; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.08 to 5.09) and drug studies alone (OR, 2.64; 95% CI, 1.09 to 6.39). CONCLUSION: COI is widespread among the authors of published manuscripts and these authors are more likely to present positive findings.

Keywords:
MeSH Terms: Conflict of Interest*/economics Drug Industry Ethics, Research* Humans Periodicals/standards Periodicals/statistics & numerical data Publication Bias*/statistics & numerical data Research Support/economics* Research Support/ethics

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend