corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 2252

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: Journal Article

Klassen TP.
Economic evaluations of immunoprophylaxis in infants at high risk for respiratory syncytial virus: shedding light or creating confusion?
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2002 Dec; 156:(12):1180-1
http://archpedi.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/full/156/12/1180


Abstract:

Bronchiolitis has huge resource costs. Three RCTs have examined the effectiveness of immunoprophylaxis with RSV-IGIV or palivizumab in high-risk infants. The primary observed benefit was reduction of hospitalization burden. No significant benefit was observed in mortality. Economic evaluations could help decide whether to adopt a passive immunization strategy. However, many evaluations are sub-standard. Hill et al. examined 326 analyses submitted to the Australian Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme. 67% had significant problems. Evans argued that guidelines may give the illusion of scientific rigor and respectability, while funding influence may still distort conclusions and recommendations, because there is too much subjectivity and choice about methods. Kamal-Bahl et al. (2002) systematically reviewed 12 economic evaluations of RSV-IGIV and palivizumab. Results ranged from cost savings to considerable incremental costs per hospitalization avoided. Studies comparing the two agents reported mixed results about relative cost-effectiveness. More disturbingly, all four studies with pharmaceutical support reported possible cost-effectiveness or cost-savings with prophylaxis in the entire high-risk infant population vs zero of the eight studies without such funding (P = .002). It is astounding that 3 RCTs spawned 12 economic evaluations. The debate would have been clarified by larger RCTs using mortality or severe morbidity. Economic evaluations must be methodologically sound and sufficiently transparent. Sponsorship disclosure should be mandatory, but is probably not sufficient. As Lewis has stated, “Some bargains are Faustian and some horses are Trojan. Dance carefully with the porcupine, and know in advance the price of intimacy.” (p. 785)

Keywords:
Antibodies, Monoclonal/economics Antibodies, Monoclonal/therapeutic use* Humans Immunoglobulins, Intravenous/therapeutic use* Infant, Newborn Randomized Controlled Trials Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infections/economics Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infections/prevention & control* Risk *editorial Australia immunoprophylaxis pharmacoeconomic analysis Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme INFORMATION FROM INDUSTRY: PHARMACOECONOMIC ANALYSIS PROMOTIONAL TECHNIQUES: PHARMACOECONOMIC DATA SPONSORSHIP: RESEARCH

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








As an advertising man, I can assure you that advertising which does not work does not continue to run. If experience did not show beyond doubt that the great majority of doctors are splendidly responsive to current [prescription drug] advertising, new techniques would be devised in short order. And if, indeed, candor, accuracy, scientific completeness, and a permanent ban on cartoons came to be essential for the successful promotion of [prescription] drugs, advertising would have no choice but to comply.
- Pierre R. Garai (advertising executive) 1963