corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 20186

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: Magazine

Limprecht E
TV program walks as pharma co fined
Australian Doctor 2005 Nov 243
http://www.australiandoctor.com.au/news/latest-news/tv-program-walks-as-pharma-co-fined


Full text:

Current affairs television can effectively promote prescription drugs directly to consumers and the broadcasting authority is unable to stamp out the practice, Australia’s leading medical media watchdog claims.

The claim follows a complaint over the alleged promotion of the weight-loss drug Xenical to viewers of Today Tonight broadcast in November 2003 when the drug was prescription only.

Although the complaint was originally made by a health professional to the Australian Broadcasting Authority, the ABA decided Xenical and two other weight-loss drugs mentioned were not within its jurisdiction and passed the complaint to the drug industry’s self-regulator, Medicines Australia.

Medicines Australia’s code of conduct committee instead fined Roche, the makers of Xenical. The committee imposed a $20,000 fine because Roche had sent Today Tonight “selective and not balanced”
information that did not include “appropriate information about precautions, side effects and contraindications”. The company had also nominated Xenical patients to speak to Today Tonight’s online medical media watchdog Media Doctor, said current affairs shows had a responsibility to viewers to ensure they were not promoting prescription drugs through news stories.

“Journalists are aware that the pharmaceutical industry is not allowed to advertise directly to the public. Getting journalists to carry promotional materials as news is a way of circumventing the law,” Professor Henry said.

“Companies will always push the boundaries and journalists will always write about new drugs. You can’t stop that, but you need someone to keep the media in line.”

He said the Australian Press Council had a role investigating biased and poor journalism surrounding stories on pharmaceutical products.

Although Roche lost its case with Medicines Australia, it had argued that it had not had editorial rights over what information was broadcast and that it was being judged on a program that had been instigated and developed by the media.

Neither Today Tonight nor the Australian Broadcasting Authority, which has recently been renamed the Australian Communications and Media Authority, responded to Australian Doctor’s queries.

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








Far too large a section of the treatment of disease is to-day controlled by the big manufacturing pharmacists, who have enslaved us in a plausible pseudo-science...
The blind faith which some men have in medicines illustrates too often the greatest of all human capacities - the capacity for self deception...
Some one will say, Is this all your science has to tell us? Is this the outcome of decades of good clinical work, of patient study of the disease, of anxious trial in such good faith of so many drugs? Give us back the childlike trust of the fathers in antimony and in the lancet rather than this cold nihilism. Not at all! Let us accept the truth, however unpleasant it may be, and with the death rate staring us in the face, let us not be deceived with vain fancies...
we need a stern, iconoclastic spirit which leads, not to nihilism, but to an active skepticism - not the passive skepticism, born of despair, but the active skepticism born of a knowledge that recognizes its limitations and knows full well that only in this attitude of mind can true progress be made.
- William Osler 1909