corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 20159

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: news

Older consumers missing fine print in direct-to-consumer drug ads
Reuters Medical News 2000 May 12


Full text:

Older Americans are being bombarded by pharmaceutical advertising, but they’re missing the fine print, which contains critical information about a drug’s risks and potential side effects, a new study shows.

Older consumers also report that they often do not talk with their physicians and pharmacists about the effects of a medication, indicating that healthcare professionals may not being doing enough to help educate patients.

The findings “suggest that many consumers face a ‘medication information gap’ in the prescription medication marketplace, even though the proliferation of direct-to-consumer advertising might be viewed as increasing the overall volume of available healthcare information”, researchers at the AARP Public Policy Institue conclude.

“Although direct-to-consumer marketing creates awareness of certain products, consumers aren’t necessarily well informed”, said Lisa A. Foley, co-author of the report and a senior policy advisor at the institute, the AARP’s research arm.

The study is based on a national telephone survey conducted by IRC Inc. in December 1998. A total of 1,310 adults were interviewed, with an oversampling of people aged 50 and older.

One third of the audience for direct-to-consumer advertising apparently fails to notice the small print, researchers report. Only 48% of those ages 60 and older said that they notice this information, compared with 67% of people age 18 to 39.

Survey results also revealed that some consumers, particularly older adults, are not always aware that the products pitched in direct-to-consumer advertising are available by prescription only. Twenty percent who have seen such advertising say that the ads “rarely” or “never” make that clear, or say they “don’t know” that a prescription is being advertised.

Furthermore, only 54% of consumers surveyed said that their physicians and pharmacists “usually” talk to them about a product’s risks or side effects.

In light of the findings, John Rother, director of legislation and public policy at the AARP, called on Congress to give the US Food and Drug Administration the authority and funding to intensify their oversight of direct-to-consumer advertising. He also said that physicians and pharmacists should be encouraged to counsel patients about prescription drug use.

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








Far too large a section of the treatment of disease is to-day controlled by the big manufacturing pharmacists, who have enslaved us in a plausible pseudo-science...
The blind faith which some men have in medicines illustrates too often the greatest of all human capacities - the capacity for self deception...
Some one will say, Is this all your science has to tell us? Is this the outcome of decades of good clinical work, of patient study of the disease, of anxious trial in such good faith of so many drugs? Give us back the childlike trust of the fathers in antimony and in the lancet rather than this cold nihilism. Not at all! Let us accept the truth, however unpleasant it may be, and with the death rate staring us in the face, let us not be deceived with vain fancies...
we need a stern, iconoclastic spirit which leads, not to nihilism, but to an active skepticism - not the passive skepticism, born of despair, but the active skepticism born of a knowledge that recognizes its limitations and knows full well that only in this attitude of mind can true progress be made.
- William Osler 1909