corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 20136

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: news

Moynihan R
NZ to get tough on drug ads
The Australian Financial Review 2000 Jun 23


Full text:

As Australia considers lifting its ban on advertising in the $3 billion prescription drug market, New Zealand is looking at re-imposing restrictions.

Spending on ads has more than doubled in the past year in New Zealand, and there are at least a dozen TV ads promoting pills for diseases including obesity, hair loss, arthritis and influenza.

Like the US, New Zealand is unusual in the world in allowing full advertising of prescription drugs directly to the public. Any move to tighten up in NZ could have serious ramifications for the pharmaceutical industry’s global push to speak more directly to those who buy its products.

A spokesperson for the NZ Ministry of Health told The Australian Financial Review the Government was giving serious consideration to changing laws to wind back ads directly targeting the public.

“The Government feels uncomfortable about the ethics, and appropriateness of these ads…and is concerned people are not fully informed of the benefits and risks”, he said.

It is understood Ministry officials have recently produced a proposal for draft legislation which would curtail the ads.

The NZ pharmaceutical industry is set to hit back with the public launch of a major research document today and plans to take a more active role in the debate.

General manager of the NZ industry lobby group RMI, Mr Terence Aschoff, says there is evidence mass advertising has brought many benefits.

“They are diseases that people don’t usually go in and get checked for – diseases like obesity, heart disease, asthma and diabetes – where there is under-diagnosis and under-treatment”, he said.

Back in Australia the debate over whether or not to allow drug advertising to consumers continues, with ongoing controversy surrounding GlaxoWellcome’s flu education campaign, currently running alongside its marketing of flu drug Relenza.

One Glaxo ad run repeatedly in the national press portrays a petite young woman as the common cold on the left hand side of the page, and a large “butch” looking woman as the flu on the right. The ad is titled: “You’re more likely to go to bed with the one on the right”.

Public health expert Professor Stephen Leeder described the promotion as sexist saying: “I’m surprised a company of Glaxo’s reputation put this ad out”.

But country GP and influenza researcher, Dr Richard Watts, who has acted as a consult for GlaxoWellcome, strongly endorses the campaign to educate people about the difference between the cold and the flu.

“If it means people come and see me so I can give them the choice of using the drug Relenza or not, I think it is a reasonable thing to do”.

The creative design of the ads were handled by global media ad agency Medicus R&R.

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








Far too large a section of the treatment of disease is to-day controlled by the big manufacturing pharmacists, who have enslaved us in a plausible pseudo-science...
The blind faith which some men have in medicines illustrates too often the greatest of all human capacities - the capacity for self deception...
Some one will say, Is this all your science has to tell us? Is this the outcome of decades of good clinical work, of patient study of the disease, of anxious trial in such good faith of so many drugs? Give us back the childlike trust of the fathers in antimony and in the lancet rather than this cold nihilism. Not at all! Let us accept the truth, however unpleasant it may be, and with the death rate staring us in the face, let us not be deceived with vain fancies...
we need a stern, iconoclastic spirit which leads, not to nihilism, but to an active skepticism - not the passive skepticism, born of despair, but the active skepticism born of a knowledge that recognizes its limitations and knows full well that only in this attitude of mind can true progress be made.
- William Osler 1909