corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 20074

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: Magazine

Fleming K
Changes ordered to 40 software ads to comply with code
Medical Observer 2005 Sep 152


Full text:

Forty advertisements on GP prescribing software Medical Director will be changed because the Medicines Australia monitoring committee suspected they breached the industry code of conduct.

The committee found 40 ads for 27 different medications on Medical Director 2.83 that it believe breached the code.

A complaint from La Trobe University public health lecturer Dr Ken Harvey resulted in seven ads on version 2.81 being found in breach last month.

Medicines Australia spokeswoman Deborah Monk said none of the 40 ads were previously found in breach on the 2.81 version.

Ms Monk said the 13 companies responsible for the 40 ads had or would make the necessary changes to comply with the code and were unlikely to be referred to the independent code of conduct committee as a formal complaint.

The monitoring committee had no current plans to review Medical Director 3.

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








Cases of wilful misrepresentation are a rarity in medical advertising. For every advertisement in which nonexistent doctors are called on to testify or deliberately irrelevant references are bunched up in [fine print], you will find a hundred or more whose greatest offenses are unquestioning enthusiasm and the skill to communicate it.

The best defence the physician can muster against this kind of advertising is a healthy skepticism and a willingness, not always apparent in the past, to do his homework. He must cultivate a flair for spotting the logical loophole, the invalid clinical trial, the unreliable or meaningless testimonial, the unneeded improvement and the unlikely claim. Above all, he must develop greater resistance to the lure of the fashionable and the new.
- Pierre R. Garai (advertising executive) 1963