corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 20070

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: Magazine

Limprecht E
Medical Director ads to be scrutinised
Australian Doctor 2005 Sep 212


Full text:

Every advertisement in the latest version of Medical Director is being reviewed by the Medicines Australia Code of Conduct monitoring committee to see if it complies with the advertising code, after six ads were found to have breached the code last month.

The advertisements were referred to the committee by Dr Ken Harvey, who published research in the
Medical Journal of Australia alleging 95% of ads on Medical Director were in breach of the industry’s self-regulating code.

If the monitoring committee finds evidence of any advertisements contravening the code it will inform the responsible pharmaceutical company, but it is highly unlikely any of the companies will be fined or otherwise reprimanded.

“The monitoring committee writes to the companies but it would be very unusual for the committee to make a complaint,” said Ms Deborah Monk, director of scientific and technical affairs at Medicines Australia.

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








Cases of wilful misrepresentation are a rarity in medical advertising. For every advertisement in which nonexistent doctors are called on to testify or deliberately irrelevant references are bunched up in [fine print], you will find a hundred or more whose greatest offenses are unquestioning enthusiasm and the skill to communicate it.

The best defence the physician can muster against this kind of advertising is a healthy skepticism and a willingness, not always apparent in the past, to do his homework. He must cultivate a flair for spotting the logical loophole, the invalid clinical trial, the unreliable or meaningless testimonial, the unneeded improvement and the unlikely claim. Above all, he must develop greater resistance to the lure of the fashionable and the new.
- Pierre R. Garai (advertising executive) 1963