corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 19773

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: Magazine

Arnot D
GPs not immune to marketing at CPD events
Medical Observer 2005 Nov 11


Full text:

EDITOR: Professor Deborah Saitman’s article. ‘Don’t criticise GPs for efficient learning’ (Opinion, 21 October), labours under contradiction and misplaced metaphor, making it difficult to deduce whether her intent is to condemn or defend drug-sponsored ‘fine food CPD’. Some assertations, nonetheless, warrant challenge.
Professor Saitman asserts doctors wouldn’t attend educational events for a swish. Over the past 10 years in general practise, I have attended quite a few CPD events at expensive venues and shared guilty chuckles with many a tablemate at the predictable discrepancy between the lush fare provided by the pharmaceutical company and the paltry education value of the evening.
Professor Saitman also states that she knows of no other profession apart from cooks and food critics who would “chose to work to improve themselves while… eating”.
However, other professions do undertake continuing improvement improvement, often mandatory, and often outside of paid work hours. Doctors are not alone in facing trying circumstances.
The medical profession, however is not alone in allowing (and expecting) our CPD to be paid for by parties with conflicting interests.
A dentist pays around $3000 a year for professional improvement courses (and no, the principle doesn’t charge more just because they earn more than we do).
Other industries are wined, dined and “educated” by trade sales representatives, but they recognise this for what it is – product marketing and a sales pitch, designed to influence rather than illuminate, as in all advertising.
We need to stop deluding ourselves that because we are ‘smart guys’ we are immune to the influence that exposure to marketing creates.
What we absorb at product marketing meetings we take back to the consulting room and inflict on our patients. They should, and do, expect better.
Dr Dean Arnot
Kew, Victoria

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








Far too large a section of the treatment of disease is to-day controlled by the big manufacturing pharmacists, who have enslaved us in a plausible pseudo-science...
The blind faith which some men have in medicines illustrates too often the greatest of all human capacities - the capacity for self deception...
Some one will say, Is this all your science has to tell us? Is this the outcome of decades of good clinical work, of patient study of the disease, of anxious trial in such good faith of so many drugs? Give us back the childlike trust of the fathers in antimony and in the lancet rather than this cold nihilism. Not at all! Let us accept the truth, however unpleasant it may be, and with the death rate staring us in the face, let us not be deceived with vain fancies...
we need a stern, iconoclastic spirit which leads, not to nihilism, but to an active skepticism - not the passive skepticism, born of despair, but the active skepticism born of a knowledge that recognizes its limitations and knows full well that only in this attitude of mind can true progress be made.
- William Osler 1909