corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 1957

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: news

Croasdale M.
Drug firms to fund residency slots in dermatology pilot program
American Medical Association ( AMA News) 2005 Jul 18
http://www.amednews.com/2005/prl20718


Abstract:

DRUG FIRMS TO FUND RESIDENCY SLOTS IN DERMATOLOGY PILOT PROGRAM
Ethicists express concerns about inherent conflicts of interest in such
a relationship.
By Myrle Croasdale, July 18, 2005.

Faced with a work-force shortage and no new federal funding for resident
training, the American Academy of Dermatology is expanding residency
slots by using pharmaceutical company donations. AAD leaders say enough
safeguards are in place to prevent conflicts of interest that could
arise from the relationship, but critics say such funding compromises
the medical profession and leaves it beholden to for-profit
corporations. The academy’s goal is to increase dermatology resident
positions by up to 10% — about 30 new slots — per year. A pilot
program will fund an initial 10 slots at $60,000 per slot per year for
three years starting in July 2006. […]

Read the entire article in American Medical News:

www.amednews.com/2005/prl20718


Notes:

Ralph Faggotter’s Comments: What hope is there for independence of thought when your specialist training position is being funded by a drug company?
Why would a drug company pay for this training if they didn’t expect a good return on their investment?

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








...to influence multinational corporations effectively, the efforts of governments will have to be complemented by others, notably the many voluntary organisations that have shown they can effectively represent society’s public-health interests…
A small group known as Healthy Skepticism; formerly the Medical Lobby for Appropriate Marketing) has consistently and insistently drawn the attention of producers to promotional malpractice, calling for (and often securing) correction. These organisations [Healthy Skepticism, Médecins Sans Frontières and Health Action International] are small, but they are capable; they bear malice towards no one, and they are inscrutably honest. If industry is indeed persuaded to face up to its social responsibilities in the coming years it may well be because of these associations and others like them.
- Dukes MN. Accountability of the pharmaceutical industry. Lancet. 2002 Nov 23; 360(9346)1682-4.