corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 19525

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: news

An Unhealthy Influence on Doctors
The New York Times 2001 Sep 10
http://www.nytimes.com/2001/09/10/opinion/an-unhealthy-influence-on-doctors.html


Full text:

The public image of the medical profession has been hurt by doctors who accept freebies from pharmaceutical companies. So the American Medical Association recently launched a campaign to remind its members about the A.M.A.‘s ethical guidelines. The campaign budget of $750,000 comes mostly from the pharmaceutical business.

Somehow, we have a feeling the A.M.A. has missed the point.

The medical association seems to be working with the corporations to combat corporate influence. But in reality, the campaign’s goals are not even that ambitious. The problem, as the A.M.A. seems to see it, is with the public, and the target is ‘‘the perception of conflict-of-interest.’‘

Not surprisingly, the rules the A.M.A. is trying to publicize lack teeth. They suggest that doctors avoid rewards for writing prescriptions and refuse gifts that do not aid their patients or their work. But doctors can still accept travel and meals while on the job, as well as pens, notepads and books. Compliance is completely voluntary.
Stronger action is needed to combat the very real influence of pharmaceutical companies on doctors’ behavior. On the other side of the $700,000 donated to the A.M.A.‘s campaign sits the $16 billion the industry spent last year on gifts and free drug samples. A sizable stack of research shows that doctors are more likely to prescribe drugs from makers who offer gifts, even if the drugs cost more and are no more effective than the alternatives.

Many doctors got into the habit of accepting gifts from pharmaceutical companies as underpaid residents or unpaid medical students, for whom a free lunch or textbook is a real bonus. But some medical schools are now trying to protect their budding doctors from developing bad habits. Columbia bars drug companies from offering meals on its campus, and one medical school professor has started a crusade called No Free Lunch that encourages his colleagues to refuse all presents. On the downside are published reports of Ohio doctors demanding that drug company salesmen pay for the physicians’ time as well as their meals.

It is hard for the patient to know whether a doctor is prescribing the best-promoted rather than the most cost-effective drugs. But when you walk into your doctor’s office and she’s using a Zoloft pen to write on a Zocor notepad next to a Zyrtec coffee mug, feel free to ask questions.

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








Far too large a section of the treatment of disease is to-day controlled by the big manufacturing pharmacists, who have enslaved us in a plausible pseudo-science...
The blind faith which some men have in medicines illustrates too often the greatest of all human capacities - the capacity for self deception...
Some one will say, Is this all your science has to tell us? Is this the outcome of decades of good clinical work, of patient study of the disease, of anxious trial in such good faith of so many drugs? Give us back the childlike trust of the fathers in antimony and in the lancet rather than this cold nihilism. Not at all! Let us accept the truth, however unpleasant it may be, and with the death rate staring us in the face, let us not be deceived with vain fancies...
we need a stern, iconoclastic spirit which leads, not to nihilism, but to an active skepticism - not the passive skepticism, born of despair, but the active skepticism born of a knowledge that recognizes its limitations and knows full well that only in this attitude of mind can true progress be made.
- William Osler 1909