corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 19272

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: Journal Article

Mitka M
Ghost Busting
JAMA 2010 Oct 13; 305:(8):743-844
http://jama.ama-assn.org/content/304/14/1546.2.extract


Abstract:

Senate Finance Committee leaders have responded to complaints by the chair of the American Heart Association’s (AHA’s) Scientific Publishing Committee that they had unfairly singled out the AHA’s journal, Circulation, for publishing a ghostwritten article (Haffner SM et al. Circulation. 2002;1066:679-684). The 2002 article touted the benefits of rosiglitazone for lowering levels of certain biomarkers for cardiovascular risk in patients with type 2 diabetes.

An article about rosiglitazone ghostwritten on behalf of its manufacturer, GlaxoSmithKline, appeared in the journal Circulation, said leaders of the Senate Finance Committee.

Initially, Sen Max Baucus (D, Mont), Finance Committee chairman, and ranking member Sen Chuck Grassley (R, Iowa) warned Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Commissioner Margaret A. Hamburg, MD, in a July 12 letter that rosiglitazone was part of a ghostwriting program conducted by the drug’s manufacturer, GlaxoSmithKline, and cited as evidence a paper that ultimately appeared in Circulation whose working …

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








...to influence multinational corporations effectively, the efforts of governments will have to be complemented by others, notably the many voluntary organisations that have shown they can effectively represent society’s public-health interests…
A small group known as Healthy Skepticism; formerly the Medical Lobby for Appropriate Marketing) has consistently and insistently drawn the attention of producers to promotional malpractice, calling for (and often securing) correction. These organisations [Healthy Skepticism, Médecins Sans Frontières and Health Action International] are small, but they are capable; they bear malice towards no one, and they are inscrutably honest. If industry is indeed persuaded to face up to its social responsibilities in the coming years it may well be because of these associations and others like them.
- Dukes MN. Accountability of the pharmaceutical industry. Lancet. 2002 Nov 23; 360(9346)1682-4.