corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 19247

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: news

Iskowitz M
CME providers must correct violative info, council says
Medical Marketing & Media 2010 12 23
http://www.mmm-online.com/cme-providers-must-correct-violative-info-council-says/article/193301/


Full text:

The non-profit group that regulates CME said providers must issue corrected information if an activity is found noncompliant.

Accredited providers will be responsible for offering the remedial information to learners, faculty and planners if an activity is found to break rules for independence, freedom from commercial bias, or content validation, the Accreditation Council for CME (ACCME) said. Providers will determine how to communicate the information and are under no obligation to say that the activity was found noncompliant, the council said, adding that the change was adopted at its November 2010 board meeting and will be implemented going forward.

“We are not specifying what exactly it is that the accredited provider has to do in order to inform the learners about this noncompliance or about change,” said Dr. Murray Kopelow, ACCME executive director, adding that this will depend on the facts and circumstances. “That will be left up to providers, and the ACCME will simply ensure that action has been taken and that it is meaningful.” They must also issue a corrective statement to the ACCME, including a report of the information transmitted.
The change stems from input the CME community offered to a proposal. The comment period ended in September.

It’s the second refinement ACCME has made this year to the Complaints and Inquiries process, which it uses to investigate criticisms lodged against activities. In July, the council decided, based on stakeholder feedback, that accredited med ed providers who break the rules should not be identified, unless changes in their accreditation status occur. The community had voted overwhelmingly in favor of discretion during the adjudication process.

“This is an action in keeping with our policy and our approach of transparency,” Kopelow added of the latest refinement. “We want providers and the system to know what it is that we are finding in compliance and not…and in ensuring that accredited CME is in the best interest of the public and of the learners.”

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








Far too large a section of the treatment of disease is to-day controlled by the big manufacturing pharmacists, who have enslaved us in a plausible pseudo-science...
The blind faith which some men have in medicines illustrates too often the greatest of all human capacities - the capacity for self deception...
Some one will say, Is this all your science has to tell us? Is this the outcome of decades of good clinical work, of patient study of the disease, of anxious trial in such good faith of so many drugs? Give us back the childlike trust of the fathers in antimony and in the lancet rather than this cold nihilism. Not at all! Let us accept the truth, however unpleasant it may be, and with the death rate staring us in the face, let us not be deceived with vain fancies...
we need a stern, iconoclastic spirit which leads, not to nihilism, but to an active skepticism - not the passive skepticism, born of despair, but the active skepticism born of a knowledge that recognizes its limitations and knows full well that only in this attitude of mind can true progress be made.
- William Osler 1909