corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 19148

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: Journal Article

Brody H, Light DW
The Inverse Benefit Law: How Drug Marketing Undermines Patient Safety and Public Health.
Am J Public Health 2011 Jan 13;
http://ajph.aphapublications.org/cgi/content/short/AJPH.2010.199844v1


Abstract:

Recent highly publicized withdrawals
of drugs from the market because of
safety concerns raise the question
of whether these events are random
failures or part of a recurring
pattern. The inverse benefit law,
inspired by Hart’s inverse care law,
states that the ratio of benefits to
harms among patients taking new
drugs tends to vary inversely with
how extensively the drugs are
marketed. The law is manifested
through 6 basic marketing
strategies: reducing thresholds for
diagnosing disease, relying on
surrogate endpoints, exaggerating
safety claims, exaggerating efficacy
claims, creating new diseases, and
encouraging unapproved uses. The
inverse benefit law highlights the
need for comparative effectiveness
research and other reforms to
improve evidence-based prescribing.

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








Cases of wilful misrepresentation are a rarity in medical advertising. For every advertisement in which nonexistent doctors are called on to testify or deliberately irrelevant references are bunched up in [fine print], you will find a hundred or more whose greatest offenses are unquestioning enthusiasm and the skill to communicate it.

The best defence the physician can muster against this kind of advertising is a healthy skepticism and a willingness, not always apparent in the past, to do his homework. He must cultivate a flair for spotting the logical loophole, the invalid clinical trial, the unreliable or meaningless testimonial, the unneeded improvement and the unlikely claim. Above all, he must develop greater resistance to the lure of the fashionable and the new.
- Pierre R. Garai (advertising executive) 1963