corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 19148

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: Journal Article

Brody H, Light DW
The Inverse Benefit Law: How Drug Marketing Undermines Patient Safety and Public Health.
Am J Public Health 2011 Jan 13;
http://ajph.aphapublications.org/cgi/content/short/AJPH.2010.199844v1


Abstract:

Recent highly publicized withdrawals
of drugs from the market because of
safety concerns raise the question
of whether these events are random
failures or part of a recurring
pattern. The inverse benefit law,
inspired by Hart’s inverse care law,
states that the ratio of benefits to
harms among patients taking new
drugs tends to vary inversely with
how extensively the drugs are
marketed. The law is manifested
through 6 basic marketing
strategies: reducing thresholds for
diagnosing disease, relying on
surrogate endpoints, exaggerating
safety claims, exaggerating efficacy
claims, creating new diseases, and
encouraging unapproved uses. The
inverse benefit law highlights the
need for comparative effectiveness
research and other reforms to
improve evidence-based prescribing.

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








Far too large a section of the treatment of disease is to-day controlled by the big manufacturing pharmacists, who have enslaved us in a plausible pseudo-science...
The blind faith which some men have in medicines illustrates too often the greatest of all human capacities - the capacity for self deception...
Some one will say, Is this all your science has to tell us? Is this the outcome of decades of good clinical work, of patient study of the disease, of anxious trial in such good faith of so many drugs? Give us back the childlike trust of the fathers in antimony and in the lancet rather than this cold nihilism. Not at all! Let us accept the truth, however unpleasant it may be, and with the death rate staring us in the face, let us not be deceived with vain fancies...
we need a stern, iconoclastic spirit which leads, not to nihilism, but to an active skepticism - not the passive skepticism, born of despair, but the active skepticism born of a knowledge that recognizes its limitations and knows full well that only in this attitude of mind can true progress be made.
- William Osler 1909