corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 19085

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: news

Silverman E
EU Trade Deal Could Cost Canada $3B For Drugs
Pharmalot 2011 Feb 7
http://www.pharmalot.com/2011/02/eu-trade-deal-could-cost-canada-3b-for-drugs/


Full text:

A trade deal being negotiated between Canada and the European Union could cost Canadians another $2.8 billion annually in drug costs – notably, by delaying the availability of lower-cost generics in Canada by about 3.5 years – if certain proposals are cemented, according to a new report commissioned by generic drugmakers.
During the talks, the EU has sought various changes in Canadian laws and regulations governing intellectual property concerning brand-name meds. These include extending the term of patent protection by up to five years if drugs are bogged down in the regulatory approval process; lengthening the period of data exclusivity from eight years to 10 years or more; and strengthening notice of compliance regulations by adding an appeals process.
The upshot is that Canadian payers would face “substantially higher drug costs as exclusivity is extended on top-selling prescription drugs,” according to the report, which was paid for by the Canadian Generic Pharmaceutical Association (you can read it here).
“The reasonable inference is that these changes are designed to allow innovating pharmaceutical firms to charge monopoly prices for a longer period,” Aidan Hollis of the Department of Economics at the University of Calgary, and a co-author of the report with Paul Grootendorst of the University of Toronto, tells The Toronto Globe & Mail.
A few nuggets: Of spending by Canadians on meds, generics account for 54 per cent and brand-name drugs are 46 per cent. Both prescription and over-the-counter meds accounted for $31 billion of the $192 billion in health spending last year. And brand-name drugs are a leading export from the EU to Canada. In 2009, Canada imported $5.3 billion from the EU and exported $1.3 billion to the EU.
In touting the report, the CGPA’s Jim Keon says “the pharmaceutical intellectual property proposals tabled by the EU, however, will not eliminate trade barriers, as pharmaceutical products from the EU already have unfettered access to the Canadian market. These proposals will simply increase profits for brand-name drug companies at the expense of Canada’s health-care system.”
However, Russell Williams, who heads Rx & D trade group in Canada for brand-name drugmakers, counters that, “if we want to attract innovation dollars and the good jobs that come along with them, we need a globally competitive regime and we don’t have one now. Without R&D, without innovative drugs, there will be nothing for generics to copy.”

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








Far too large a section of the treatment of disease is to-day controlled by the big manufacturing pharmacists, who have enslaved us in a plausible pseudo-science...
The blind faith which some men have in medicines illustrates too often the greatest of all human capacities - the capacity for self deception...
Some one will say, Is this all your science has to tell us? Is this the outcome of decades of good clinical work, of patient study of the disease, of anxious trial in such good faith of so many drugs? Give us back the childlike trust of the fathers in antimony and in the lancet rather than this cold nihilism. Not at all! Let us accept the truth, however unpleasant it may be, and with the death rate staring us in the face, let us not be deceived with vain fancies...
we need a stern, iconoclastic spirit which leads, not to nihilism, but to an active skepticism - not the passive skepticism, born of despair, but the active skepticism born of a knowledge that recognizes its limitations and knows full well that only in this attitude of mind can true progress be made.
- William Osler 1909